Select a region
Washington, DC Brussels Tokyo

Latest Regulatory Healthcare Product News

December

  • FDA and EMA to Begin Joint Inspections

    Posted: 15 December 2011

    Following a successful pilot program, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) will begin sharing the work of inspecting pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities in their respective regions. The initiative will start in January and will enable the two authorities to rely on each other's inspection outcomes rather than carrying out separate, duplicate inspections. FDA and EMA officials say it will allow the agencies to work more efficiently and shift needed resources to other regions.

    Read more:
  • Bill Would Require Increased Monitoring of Implants

    Posted: 15 December 2011

    New legislation introduced in the US Senate this week would compel manufacturers of certain medical implants to more closely monitor their products after they have been approved and are on the market. The proposal is an attempt to address mounting problems that have been reported in metal artificial hips and other implants, which do not require human testing for clearance under FDA’s 510(k) process. While the bipartisan bill would not require additional premarket testing, it would give the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) additional authority to force device makers to track and report the performance of such implants.

    Read more:
  • France May Toughen Regulations After Mediator

    Posted: 15 December 2011

    French lawmakers are looking to toughen drug regulations in the wake of the scandal over handling of the diabetes pill Mediator, linked to as many as 2,000 deaths over 33 years. Public trust in France’s drug regulator, known as AFSSAPS, has taken a big hit over allegations that officials ignored decades-old warning signs about the drug and that the agency failed to address conflicts of interest that may have played a role in the failure to quickly address Mediator’s risks. Lawmakers now aim to put an end to such conflicts of interest and bring more accountability for reporting them, possibly making the failure to do so a criminal offense, as is the case in the US.

    Read more:
  • Manufacturers Get Extension on Reporting Payments to Docs

    Posted: 15 December 2011

    This week, the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its draft regulations covering the procedures for manufacturers of healthcare products to report payments to doctors and disclose that information to the public. The new reporting requirement was enacted under the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, part of last year’s healthcare reform legislation, and was initially supposed to come into force 1 January 2012. However, the draft regulation was delayed, giving companies until the final rule is published sometime in 2012 before they must start reporting payments. The act requires manufacturers of drugs, devices or biologics covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report all physician payments above $10 and to pay penalties for failure to meet that obligation.

    Read more:
  • HHS Overrules FDA on Morning-after Pill

    Posted: 8 December 2011

    In an unprecedented move, US Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled a decision by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to allow over-the-counter sales of the “morning-after” contraceptive pill to women younger than 17. While FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg issued a statement outlining why the agency had found the Plan B One-Step pill safe to sell over the counter, Sebelius issued her own statement contending the data “do not conclusively establish that Plan B One-Step should be made available over the counter for all girls of reproductive age.” The pill is currently available without a prescription for women 17 and older.

    Read more:
  • China Unveils Plan to Improve Drug Safety

    Posted: 8 December 2011

    China’s State Council this week approved a five-year plan to bolster the country’s drug safety standards. "Our country's pharmaceutical companies are experiencing various problems such as the lack of an integrated credit system, inadequate supervision and a weak technical foundation. Medicinal safety is in a high-risk stage," according to an official statement released after the State Council executive meeting. Under the plan, there will be quick revision of the laws and regulations governing standards for medicines and biological products to bring them in line with other key global regulatory agencies, stepped up action to combat counterfeiting, strengthening of enforcement powers and improved monitoring of adverse events and postmarket surveillance. The plan also calls for China to take the lead in setting global standards for traditional Chinese medicine.

    Read more:
  • Healthcare Executives Held Liable for Wrongdoing

    Posted: 8 December 2011

    In some recent high-profile cases, federal prosecutors have revived the doctrine under US law that holds corporate executives responsible for company wrongdoing, even if their knowledge of the misdeeds cannot be established. Known as the "responsible corporate officer" or Park doctrine, prosecutors do not have to prove an executive knew of violations, only that the executive was in a position of responsibility to prevent them. While the doctrine has been little used for decades, a number of healthcare company executives have recently been convicted without proof they were aware of unlawful activity, and face sentences including prison time and long-term bans on doing business with the federal government.

    Read more:
  • US Supreme Court Hears Diagnostic Patent Case

    Posted: 8 December 2011

    This week, the US Supreme Court heard arguments concerning whether observed correlations between drug dosages and medical treatment can be patent protected. The case’s outcome could affect the future of companion diagnostics and personalized medicine. The patent in question is held by Prometheus Laboratories and covers a method to find the correct dosage of a drug to treat gastrointestinal disorders based on metabolite levels in patients’ blood. Prometheus claims the Mayo Clinic violated its patent in developing a similar test. The Mayo Clinic is questioning the validity of a patent based on scientific observations.

    Read more:

November

  • Senator’s Plan Would Expand FDA Accelerated Approval Program

    Posted: 17 November 2011

    A plan in the works from Sen. Kay Hagan of North Carolina, working closely with the Biotechnology Industry Organization, would expand the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accelerated approval program for drugs for unmet needs. The proposed plan would define a pathway for drugmakers to gain marketing approval for a drug that addresses an unmet medical need, supported by only Phase II clinical data. FDA already has the authority to grant such approval on a case-by-case basis, but uses it infrequently. The proposal would clearly lay out the rules and criteria drugmakers would need to meet.

    Read more:
  • China Steps Up Enforcement Against Drug Counterfeiting

    Posted: 17 November 2011

    China this week took significant steps against the country’s counterfeit drug producers, establishing a new national office of intellectual property rights infringement and counterfeiting, and seizing the equivalent of $315 million (US) worth of fake drugs and packaging. The counterfeit drug seizures occurred in nationwide raids and was the second major enforcement action in recent weeks. As China has come under increasing global scrutiny as a source of counterfeit drugs, the Chinese government has felt increasing pressure to act in order to bolster international confidence in Chinese drugs and active pharmaceutical ingredients.

    Read more:
  • Shuren Defends CDRH, Vows to Work With Device Makers

    Posted: 17 November 2011

    Appearing before a US Senate Committee this week, Jeffrey Shuren, director of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), acknowledged shortcomings within CDRH due to personnel turnover and other factors, but defended the center’s process for medical device review. Fielding a number of tough questions from committee members about lengthy review times, he also put some of the blame on device makers for poor submissions, but promised to do more to rectify that. "We do need to work with industry ... on ensuring we're getting quality submissions," he said. "We're working on criteria for when we would not accept an application."

    Read more:
  • FDA Safety Warnings Inadequate, Says Report

    Posted: 17 November 2011

    A new report published in the Archives of Internal Medicine contends the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) safety-alert system is falling short. FDA’s process for monitoring its adverse-events database and publicizing early findings that could signal potential safety risks has resulted in some drug-label changes, but without adequate advice about their significance or what patients and healthcare providers should do in response, say the article’s authors. "The FDA should consider changing the statements ... to better reflect the significance of potential safety signals," they say.

    Read more:
  • EMA Subject of Fraud Investigation

    Posted: 10 November 2011

    The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is under investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) regarding alleged conflicts of interest. The investigation comes in the wake of a scandal over the French diabetes drug, Mediator, removed from the European market in 2009 because of its link to fatal heart problems more than a decade after evidence of the link had surfaced. A French Member of the European Parliament initiated the investigation due to concerns about EMA’s objectivity, pointing out that 80% of the agency’s budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

    Read more:
  • IOM Report Calls for New Agency to Regulate Health IT

    Posted: 10 November 2011

    The Institute of Medicine (IOM) this week released a new report recommending a brand new agency be created to regulate health information technology. The report explicitly advises against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) taking on this oversight responsibility at this time. “Our feeling was that if the FDA got too involved, that could inhibit innovation,” said one member of the IOM committee that produced the report. Health IT is rapidly developing in the private sector and the federal government is also promoting its usage through a $27 billion dollar portion of President Barack Obama’s 2009 economic stimulus bill, but it is still unclear where regulatory oversight responsibility for health information resides.

    Read more:
  • FDA Extends Comment Period for 510(k) Guidance

    Posted: 10 November 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended the public comment period for its draft guidance on medical device 510(k) clearance for modified devices. The draft, entitled "510(k) Device Modifications: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device," is open for stakeholders and the public to submit comments until 28 November. "The agency believes that this will allow adequate time for interested persons to submit comments without significantly delaying action by the agency," according to the notice published in the Federal Register this week.

    Read more:
  • CBO Says Pay-for-delay Ban Would Save $4.8 Billion

    Posted: 10 November 2011

    A new report from the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates a $4.8 billion savings would result from banning settlements between brand name drugmakers and generic companies to delay generic versions of innovator medicines. The savings from banning the so-called “pay-for-delay” deals was calculated by CBO for a 10-year period and is nearly double previous estimates of around $2.6 billion from CBO last year and $2.67 billion from the Federal Trade Commission just last month.

    Read more:
  • Obama Orders FDA to Address Drug Shortages

    Posted: 3 November 2011

    President Obama issued an executive order this week directing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to take specific actions to prevent and reduce future drug shortages. Under the order, FDA will require drugmakers to provide advance notice of manufacturing problems likely to lead to shortages, and the agency will expedite review of new drug suppliers, manufacturing sites and manufacturing changes in cases where expedited review will help avoid or mitigate shortages. Under the order, FDA will also be required to report suspected stockpiling or price gouging of scarce drugs to the Department of Justice. Generic drugmakers have pledged to work closely with FDA to address the shortage problem.

    Read more:
  • MHRA Seeks Input on Consolidation of Drug Laws

    Posted: 3 November 2011

    The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has launched a formal public consultation on the consolidation of UK medicines legislation. MHRA’s goal is to simplify existing laws regulating medicines in the UK, and the agency has invited stakeholders and the public to provide input. The initiative seeks to replace around 200 legal statutes and much of the Medicines Act of 1968. “It will amalgamate 40 years of outdated and fragmented legislation, reducing it by around two thirds, making it clearer and easier to understand as well as ensuring that medicines regulation is supported by a modern and straightforward legal framework,” said MHRA Chief Executive, Sir Kent Woods,

    Read more:
  • FDA Reports 35 Drugs Approved in FY 2011

    Posted: 3 November 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported having approved 35 new medicines over the past 12 months, the second-highest number of approvals in the past decade and topped only by the agency’s 37 approvals in 2009. The report comes as Congress is considering reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, due next year. “Thirty-five major drug approvals in one year represents a very strong performance, both by industry and by the FDA, and we continue to use every resource possible to get new treatments to patients,” said FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg in a statement. FDA noted some of the approved drugs it deemed important medical advances, including: two new treatments for hepatitis C; a drug for late-stage prostate cancer; the first new drug for Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 30 years; and the first new drug for lupus in 50 years.

    Read more:
  • India to Expand Drug Price Controls

    Posted: 3 November 2011

    The Indian government announced plans to set price controls for at least 400 essential drugs, about 60% of the country’s domestic pharmaceuticals market. This represents a substantial increase from the 34 medicines—around 20–30% of the market—currently under government price control. The proposal would also change the way prices of controlled products are regulated, switching from a system where prices are based upon market share to one that would set a price ceiling based on the weighted average price of the top three brands. The move would likely force dramatic price cuts on most imported brands subject to the price controls.

    Read more:

October

  • PDUFA Re-auth May Bring More Communication, Predictability

    Posted: 27 October 2011

    As the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gets closer to making its final recommendations on changes to the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) before the US Congress considers the re-authorization of the law required next year, one revision being proposed is increased communication between the agency and product sponsors. Current proposed recommendations would commit FDA to specific review timelines and require agency representatives to meet with sponsors three times at specific points during the process. Product sponsors and their regulatory staffs have been calling on FDA for a more predictable process, and these scheduled meetings are expected to help keep applicants better clued in to FDA’s thinking as it develops during the review period.

    Read more:
  • FTC Renews Call for Pay-for-delay Ban

    Posted: 27 October 2011

    As the US Congressional bipartisan “super committee” charged with identifying areas for cutting the federal budget nears its deadline, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a report showing that a ban on pay-for-delay settlements would save $2.67 billion over 10 years. FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz has been a vocal critic of the deals between brand-name drugmakers and generic manufacturers that delay market entry for generic drugs. "Fortunately, Congress has the opportunity to fix this problem through the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction—and save the government and American taxpayers billions of dollars," said Leibowitz.

    Read more:
  • FDA Invests $2 Million in Regulatory Science Centers

    Posted: 27 October 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will invest $2 million to create two Centers of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation, intended to help the agency improve and modernize its oversight of healthcare product industries that are rapidly developing new, innovative technologies. The grant will fund centers at the University of Maryland and Georgetown University. According to FDA, they will be tasked with assisting federal regulators in "driving innovation in medical product development as well as in advancing laboratory, population, behavioral and manufacturing sciences."

    Read more:
  • Drugmakers Share Info to Fight Tropical Diseases

    Posted: 27 October 2011

    Eight drugmakers agreed to share patented information through a UN-administered consortium aimed at speeding development of medicines and therapies to fight tropical diseases. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) launched the consortium this week as a way to boost research on treatments for diseases that may not otherwise be developed because the commercial potential for the treatments is limited. WIPO's director general said that by joining the initiative, “companies and researchers commit to making selected intellectual property assets available under royalty-free licenses to qualified researchers anywhere in the world for research and development on neglected tropical diseases, malaria and tuberculosis.” Participants include AstraZeneca , GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Pfizer.

    Read more:
  • EU to Set Strict Limits on Rx Info to Patients

    Posted: 13 October 2011

    Under proposed rules released this week, the European Commission (EC) will set strict limits on information drugmakers are allowed to provide directly to patients about prescription medicines. The current ban on direct-to-consumer advertising would remain in place under the proposal and additional restrictions would be enacted. The proposed rules would amend a 2008 EC proposal that was criticized as too permissive. The new rules would allow prescription drug information only in specific places such as on drug packaging, labels and instructions, but not in third-party publications and elsewhere as drugmakers had hoped.

    Read more:
  • FDA, CMS Launch Parallel Innovative Device Review Pilot

    Posted: 13 October 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have launched a pilot parallel review program for innovative medical devices. Under the program, reviewers from FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) and CMS will simultaneously review devices for both FDA approval and Medicare coverage. FDA and CMS officials anticipate parallel review will increase efficiency and help facilitate the development of innovative new products. “The pilot program will help the FDA and CMS streamline the parallel review process so that it works efficiently for expedient patient access to safe and effective medical devices,” said CDRH Director Jeffrey Shuren.

    Read more:
  • FDA to Issue Three Biosimilars Guidances in 2011

    Posted: 13 October 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will release three separate guidance documents on biosimilars "before the end of the year," said Janet Woodcock, director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, according to a report from BioCentury. Woodcock announced the plans during remarks before a recent conference on rare diseases and orphan products. She did not go into specifics about what the documents will address, but an FDA spokesperson promised they will "cover the most pressing scientific issues facing a manufacturer as they contemplate developing a biosimilars program."

    Read more:
  • Google Backs Genomics Data Start-up, Will Host Data in Cloud

    Posted: 13 October 2011

    DNAnexus, a genomics data management start-up company, has secured Google Ventures as one of its big backers in a $15 million second round of financing, and will allow Google to provide web access to genomics data. The deal will result in a web-based interface for searching and accessing data in the public Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database. Google Cloud Storage will host this central repository for the massive amounts of genomics data, giving investigators access to information that could impact innovative personalized treatments. The move could mean a major role for Google in the rapidly developing area of genomics data.

    Read more:

September

  • Obama Proposal Would Limit Biologics Exclusivity Period

    Posted: 22 September 2011

    A new proposal tied to President Obama’s deficit reduction plan released this week would reduce the market exclusivity period for brand-name biologic drugs to seven years, from the 12-year period passed as part of last year’s US healthcare reform bill. The White House had pushed for the seven-year period initially, but ultimately, the healthcare law incorporated the 12 years favored by industry. According to Obama administration estimates, the shorter period would save the federal government $3.5 billion over 10 years by increasing competition. Industry has argued that the shorter exclusivity period will create a disincentive for innovation and is expected to strongly oppose the President’s proposal.

    Read more:
  • Five EU Members Sign Agreement to Safeguard Biological Info

    Posted: 22 September 2011

    Five EU Member States and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory have signed a memorandum of understanding to create an infrastructure to manage and safeguard biological information. The goal of the initiative, known as European Life-science Infrastructure for Biological Information, or ELIXIR, is to ensure open access to information about genes, proteins, complex networks and other important biological information in support of life science research. The five countries involved are Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK, with other countries expected to join in the future.

    Read more:
  • DDMAC Becomes Office of Prescription Drug Promotion

    Posted: 22 September 2011

    Reorganization at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has led to the former Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communications (DDMAC) being reorganized and upgraded to a new office, the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP). OPDP will include two divisions, one overseeing promotions aimed at healthcare professionals and one for direct-to-consumer promotions. Under the reorganization, the new office will have more authority and resources than DDMAC. “This reorganization will leverage OPDP’s resources and processes to provide for the highly effective oversight of prescription drug promotion,” said Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Director Janet Woodcock in an email to FDA staff.

    Read more:
  • Drug Supply Chain Safety Key to PDUFA Reauthorization

    Posted: 22 September 2011

    Last week’s US Senate hearing on securing the pharmaceutical supply chain put drug safety in the spotlight and illuminated a significant challenge for the pending Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) reauthorization: how to address safety concerns while also alleviating critical drug shortages. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wants more authority to police drugs and drug products entering the US from around the world, but must also take steps to address drug shortages, which Deputy Commissioner for Global Regulatory Operations and Policy Deborah Autor called a “complex economic problem.” Autor argued that track-and-trace technology would help FDA address resulting public health risks and respond accordingly and that the agency needs authority to mandate track-and-trace useage.

    Read more:
  • FDA Asks for Increased Powers Over Global Drug Supply Chain

    Posted: 15 September 2011

    In testimony before a Senate committee this week, a top US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official made the agency’s case for increased powers to police drugs entering the US from abroad. “The FDA needs the ability to refuse import of products from facilities that have delayed or denied regulatory inspections,” FDA Deputy Commissioner for Global Regulatory Operations Deborah Autor told committee members. Under current rules, FDA must show reason to believe an imported product has been adulterated or otherwise fails to meet FDA standards. Without additional powers, Autor warned another Heparin-like crisis is inevitable.

    Read more:
  • Most Clinical Trial Protocols Changed During Trial

    Posted: 15 September 2011

    According to a new study, almost 60% of clinical trial protocols for new drugs are amended during the trial, but one-third of those changes could have been avoided. This is according to a new study from the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (CSDD) released this week. Tufts researchers found that completed protocols across all clinical trials incur an average of 2.3 amendments, with each requiring an average of 6.9 changes to the protocol, leading to significant unplanned expense and delay. “Although amendments to protocols of clinical trials are sometimes necessary to optimize study results and ensure patient safety and ethical treatment, study sponsors can minimize the number of protocols through better initial study design and improved recruitment of study volunteers,” said Ken Getz, Tufts CSDD senior research fellow and assistant professor at Tufts, who led the study.

    Read more:
  • Swedish Regulator Calls for Green Pharma Manufacturing Standards

    Posted: 15 September 2011

    Sweden's Medical Products Agency (MPA) recently issued a report calling for tougher environmental standards for pharmaceutical production within the EU. The report addresses concerns over the environmental impact of pharmaceutical production in low-cost countries, such as India and China. “Today a considerable share of pharmaceutical manufacturing and production of raw materials and semi-products takes place in low-cost countries, and many large companies plan to locate even more of their production there. In the first decade of the 21st century, Swedish research findings have revealed emissions from the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals in India on a scale that can seriously impact the health of humans and animals, as well as the environment,” according to an MPA statement.

    Read more:
  • Indianapolis Ready to Host 2011 RAPS

    Posted: 15 September 2011

    A report this week in the Indianapolis Business Journal on 2011 RAPS: The Regulatory Convergence coming to the city called the conference “[t]he top event for regulatory professionals in the health care industry ,” and proclaimed it “the latest shot in the arm for the state’s regulatory affairs industry.” The annual RAPS conference is expected to draw thousands of regulatory professionals representing companies involved in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and medical devices, and from regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Korea Food and Drug Administration and China’s State Food and Drug Administration. Representatives from regulatory agencies in Canada, India, Japan, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and The Netherlands also plan to attend. The event is set for 22–26 October at the Indianapolis Convention Center.

    Read more:
  • Drugmakers, FDA Agree to New User Fee Deal

    Posted: 8 September 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reached a deal with pharmaceutical industry representatives that will give the agency an additional two months to review new drugs and raise user fees by 6%. The agreement comes after months of closed-door negotiations aimed at smoothing the way for reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), which is set to expire in October 2012. FDA has published a draft letter summarizing its performance goals and procedures related to the law’s reauthorization. Similar talks between the agency and medical device industry continue.

    Read more:
  • Report: EMA Should Compare New Drugs to Best Available

    Posted: 8 September 2011

    New drugs applying for approval in Europe should be tested against the best available comparable medicine, not against a placebo, as is the current European Medicines Agency (EMA) requirement, says a new report. EMA requires only that new drugs be compared to a placebo, except in cases where it is deemed unethical. According to the report from researchers at the London School of Economics and the European Observatory, “This does not allow patients, clinicians, and other healthcare decision makers to determine whether a new drug is superior, equivalent, or inferior to its existing alternatives. This can result in the widespread use of potentially less efficacious and unsafe drugs." Changing the rule would boost efficiency and result in better, safer medicines reaching patients faster, researchers argue.

    Read more:
  • FDA Guidance Promotes Remote Clinical Trial Monitoring

    Posted: 8 September 2011

    A new guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on risk-based approaches to monitoring clinical trials delineates how drugmakers and clinical research organizations should oversee the conduct of clinical studies, including the use of remote monitoring. While trial sponsors have been free to determine how best to monitor clinical studies conducted in disparate locations throughout the world and advances in data gathering have made remote monitoring methods more feasible, sponsors have traditionally seen site visits as more desirable by FDA. This new guidance makes the case that this is not necessarily true, and encourages the use of remote monitoring when appropriate, based on factors including the study’s complexity.

    Read more:
  • FDA Introduces Medical Device Review Staff Training

    Posted: 8 September 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has introduced a new training program for staff reviewing Premarket Applications at the agency’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). The Reviewer Certification Program, which began as a pilot in April 2010 with participants from CDRH’s Division of Anesthesia, General Hospital, and Infection Control and Dental Devices, launches this month and will be required for all new device reviewers. The program includes up to 18 months of training to sharpen staff skills and knowledge in areas such as biomedical engineering and healthcare. "This investment will improve the quality of submission review and make the process more consistent and predictable," said CDRH Director Jeffrey Shuren.

    Read more:
  • Authorized Generics Good for Consumers, Says FTC Report

    Posted: 1 September 2011

    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued its long-awaited final report on “authorized generic” drugs this week, concluding that consumers benefit from these drugs, despite the objections of many generic drugmakers. To provide an incentive for generic drugmakers to challenge brand-name drug patents and bring cheaper generic versions to market sooner, the first generic to successfully challenge an existing brand-name patent gets six months of market exclusivity without competition from other generics. However, the maker of the original drug is allowed to market its own so-called authorized generic during that six months. Many generic manufacturers have agued that this is anticompetitive and both hampers their incentive to challenge patents and hurts consumers. FTC disagrees, but acknowledges that the practice creates an opening for “pay-for-delay” deals where the original drugmaker strikes a deal with a generic company to keep a generic version off the market, which FTC does contend is anticompetitive.

    Read more:
  • India to Hold Drugmakers Responsible for Clinical Trial Deaths

    Posted: 1 September 2011

    India’s health ministry has proposed a new rule that would require drugmakers to compensate victims in cases where death or injury was caused by a clinical trial. The proposal would also place the burden of proving that a clinical trial did not cause death or injury on the drugmaker. This comes in the wake of media reports of 671 deaths during clinical trials in 2010. “Under the proposed rule, it would be the responsibility of the trial sponsor on behalf of the pharma company to prove before the ethics committee that the injury or death is not on account of clinical trial within 30 days of receiving the report of the injury or death from investigator, failing which the sponsor shall be liable to pay the compensation within 60 days or as decided by the ethics committee,” according to a health ministry official.

    Read more:
  • Consumer Group to FDA: Change Generic Labeling Rules

    Posted: 1 September 2011

    The consumer group Public Citizen is asking the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to allow generic drugmakers to update their product labeling with warnings about newly discovered risks associated with their drugs. Currently, FDA prohibits generics companies from updating labeling, even if they learn about a potential risk of a drug that is not covered in its labeling. Brand-name drugmakers, on the other hand, can update label warnings before getting FDA approval. Generic drugmakers must match drugs’ labeling to their brand-name equivalents. “Drug safety would benefit if generic manufacturers—who already have access to real-world information about adverse events—could use FDA procedures currently in place for brand-name manufacturers to revise labeling to warn of risks,” said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen Health Research Group in a press release. “Filling this regulatory gap would help to protect patients.”

    Read more:
  • Canada Unveils Patient-centered Research Initiative

    Posted: 1 September 2011

    The Canadian government recently unveiled its new “patient-oriented research strategy” intended to create a unified clinical research infrastructure and to strengthen organizational, regulatory and financial support for clinical studies conducted in Canada. “By putting patients first, we are making sure that research will have a greater impact on treatment and services provided in clinics, hospitals and doctors’ offices throughout Canada,” said Canada’s Minister of Health Leona Aglukkaq. “Better integration of research evidence and clinical practices means improved health outcomes and a better health-care system in Canada.” The strategy is summarized in paper from the President’s Advisory Board under the leadership of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

    Read more:

August

  • User Fee Deal Would Finance Foreign Inspections by FDA

    Posted: 18 August 2011

    A deal to collect user fees from generic drugmakers that would finance expanded US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspections of drug manufacturing facilities around the world is likely to pass Congress, according to reports. Under the deal, brokered in part by the president of Mylan, a large West Virginia-based generic drug company, generic makers would pay fees of $299 million annually to support FDA inspections of foreign manufacturing facilities every two years, the same frequency required for domestic plants. More than 80% of active pharmaceutical ingredients for drugs sold in the US are made elsewhere but, to this point, FDA has only been able to inspect a small fraction of foreign facilities.

    Read more:
  • Drugmakers Face Decisions as Facebook Opens Comments

    Posted: 18 August 2011

    This week, as Facebook opened some pharmaceutical industry pages to allow public commenting, drugmakers have been forced to consider the potential consequences of comments or shut down some Facebook pages. Facebook’s reversal of a policy that exempted drugmakers’ pages from a requirement to allow comments took effect Monday. Under the new policy, corporate pages or those devoted to a specific disease or patient group are now open to comments, while those pages for specific prescription drugs are still allowed to disable commenting. While the rules of engagement pertaining to social media from the US Food and Drug Administration and other regulators are still unclear, drugmakers fear that regulators could see comments on adverse events, off-label uses or other inappropriate statements as violations. Some drugmakers’ pages have already been deleted.

    Read more:
  • FDA Issues Guidances to Clarify Device Approvals Process

    Posted: 18 August 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week release two draft guidance documents it hopes will help clarify its requirements for companies seeking FDA approval of medical devices. One document outlines the agency's process for making benefit-risk determinations in assessing devices’ premarket applications. "As medical devices grow increasingly complex, many factors impact our benefit-risk determinations, especially for PMA devices. This guidance aims to provide more clarity to manufacturers about what factors we consider when making an approval decision," said Jeffrey Shuren, director of FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. The other guidance provides details on the requirements for a clinical trial in support of Premarket Application submissions for Class III devices. Both drafts are open for public comment for 90 days.

    Read more:
  • India to Require Barcodes on Drug Packaging

    Posted: 18 August 2011

    India will require drugmakers to implement a barcoding system to track drugs to and identify counterfeits, beginning in October, despite concerns from some smaller companies about their ability to comply with the new requirements. Drugs Controller General (DCGI) of India Surinder Singh acknowledged their concern and promised they would be given time to comply, but also stressed the importance of implementing the barcode system to bolster consumer confidence in Indian-made drugs as the nation competes for an increasing share of the global pharmaceutical market. "These technologies have already been introduced by the countries like Malaysia, China and to some extent Turkey," said Singh.

    Read more:
  • IOM Report Calls for 510(k) System to be Scrapped

    Posted: 4 August 2011

    Late last week, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released a report criticizing the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) 510(k) clearance process for medical devices and called for the development of a completely new framework. "The 510(k) process cannot achieve its stated goals—to promote innovation and make safe, effective devices available to patients in a timely manner—because they are fundamentally at odds with the statutes that govern how FDA must implement the process,” said David Challoner, chairman of the IOM committee that created the report. FDA officials disagree. "I don't think we should eliminate [the 510(k)] process in its entirety. It does have a role, it needs some fine-tuning," Jeffrey Shuren, head of FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, told a town hall audience in Minnesota this week. FDA intends to gather further public comment on the report through October.

    Read more:
  • International Pilots Successful, FDA-EMA Collaboration to Continue

    Posted: 4 August 2011

    A pair of pilot programs fostering increased cooperation among health regulators in the US, EU and Australia have been declared successes, paving the way for further international collaboration. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration worked together on a pilot to jointly inspect active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturers, while a second pilot between FDA and EMA focused on Good Clinical Practice. FDA and EMA have already announced plans to continue their collaboration. "It is imperative that FDA work closely with its counterparts in order to ensure the safety and quality of products and the integrity of clinical trials. We cannot do it alone," said Deborah Autor, FDA deputy commissioner for global regulatory operations and policy.

    Read more:
  • US Lawmakers Likely to Relax FDA AdComm Conflict Rules

    Posted: 4 August 2011

    Following complaints from US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials, US lawmakers appear likely to relax conflict-of-interest rules for experts serving on FDA advisory committees reviewing new drugs and devices. FDA officials, including Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, have said publicly the rules intended to guard against undue influence on FDA decisions have impeded the agency’s ability to find qualified experts. Relaxation of the current rules may be included as part of the pending reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. The issue was raised during a recent US House committee hearing on the reauthorization. A Reuters report quoted a congressional staff member familiar with the matter, saying "Based on today's hearing and the comments from Senators[Al] Franken [D-MN) and [Mike] Enzi [R-WY], I think there is a good chance that this issue could end up in the final FDA user fee bill."

    Read more:
  • India, EU Reach Agreement on Generic Drugs Dispute

    Posted: 4 August 2011

    India and the EU have reached an interim deal to prevent seizures of Indian generic drugs in transit through the EU. "Finally, EU has come around and we have agreed on an interim settlement... which means EU will not make any detention within its territory of pharmaceutical products coming from India. We will wait for the final settlement but we have not lost our right to agitate on the matter again," said Rajiv Kher, additional secretary in India’s commerce department. Indian officials brought a case to the World Trade Organization, arguing that the EU has been unlawfully seizing shipments of generic drugs in transit from India to developing countries because of unfounded suspicions of intellectual property rights violations. According to the agreement, Indian drugs will now be allowed to pass through EU countries and guidelines will be issued to all 27 EU Member States to that effect. In addition, new regulations on the matter are to be introduced in the European Parliament.

    Read more:

July

  • FDA Clarifies Rules on Changes to 510(k)-cleared Devices

    Posted: 28 July 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released draft guidance this week clarifying what types of changes to a previously-cleared medical device require a new premarket submission, and which changes do not warrant a new submission. According to FDA, changes to device features, such as labeling, manufacturing and materials, require a new 510(k) submission. "We are making the regulatory process for medical devices less challenging by better describing our expectations," said Jeffrey Shuren, director of FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. In related news, the results of a year-long investigation into FDA's medical device review process by the Institute of Medicine is due at the end of the week.

    Read more:
  • Europe to Review DTC Communications Ban

    Posted: 28 July 2011

    The EU ban on drugmakers communicating directly with patients is set to be reviewed by the European Commission as it plans to draft new rules. The new rules are intended to make regulations more uniform across the EU. “The European Commission will revise the proposals to clarify and harmonize the rules in what companies can and can’t say to patients,” said Peter Arlett, head of the European Medicines Agency’s drug safety unit. Whether restrictions will be lifted is not certain, but it seems unlikely that the new regulations would allow the type of direct-to-consumer drug advertising allowed in the US.

    Read more:
  • FDA Slow to Review Generics, May Tighten Standards

    Posted: 28 July 2011

    Despite the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) abbreviated approval process for generic drugs, review takes three times as long as for new drugs because of the volume of applications and overtaxed FDA resources. According to Keith Webber, acting director of FDA’s Office of Generic Drugs, the agency office has been getting about 850 applications a year—about 10 times the number of new drug applications. “We do prioritize the review of applications where there is no generic yet on the market,” Webber said. In a separate measure, FDA is considering even stricter standards for bioequivalency on drugs known as "critical dose drugs" or "narrow therapeutic index" drugs.

    Read more:
  • CDER Seeks to Improve Regulatory Science

    Posted: 28 July 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA’s) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) released a report this week identifying seven research and science needs that it says will help develop its regulatory science efforts. The report focuses on improving in the areas of postmarket data and analysis; risk management strategies; regulatory communications to the public and other stakeholders; linking product quality, manufacturing and performance; developing predictive models of safety and efficacy; clinical trial design, analysis and conduct; and individualization of patient treatment.

    Read more:
  • FDA Issues Draft Rules for Regulation of Mobile Apps

    Posted: 21 July 2011

    The growth of health-related mobile applications for smartphones and wireless tablets like the iPad has blurred the lines between these consumer devices and regulated medical devices, spurring the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week to release its first guidelines for regulating mobile apps. FDA has identified the types of apps it deems fall under its purview—those doctors would likely use to diagnose or monitor a patient's medical condition. These include apps that affect how a currently regulated medical device performs or functions, and those that can turn a smartphone or tablet into a regulated device, such as a blood glucose meter. “We wanted to make sure that we are consistent in regulating medical devices so nothing has changed,” said Bakul Patel, an FDA policy adviser who helped create the guidelines. If “somebody makes a stethoscope on an iPhone, it doesn’t change the level of oversight we have of a stethoscope.”

    Read more:
  • Report Calls on Australia’s TGA to Improve Transparency

    Posted: 21 July 2011

    An eight-month government panel investigation into Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) concludes that the agency lacks transparency and calls on TGA to publish results of all its safety investigations, and improve its process for gathering adverse event reports. “The Panel considers that the TGA should adopt a pro-active stance to the many issues relating to therapeutic goods that are of concern to the public that it serves. It should move away from the conservative approach that has characterised its actions in the past and recognise that it has a duty to collaborate with stakeholders to create a culture in which the community has confidence in the therapeutic goods the TGA regulates.” The report notes the global trend toward greater government transparency and makes 21 specific recommendations to the agency. It is not clear how this report may impact the pending plan to create a joint Australia-New Zealand regulatory agency.

    Read more:
  • FDA: Slower Device Review Due to Poor Submission Quality

    Posted: 21 July 2011

    While review times for 510(k) submissions at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have increased more than 55% since 2005, agency officials say the slower review is due to poor quality submissions by device makers. FDA this week released an internal analysis of increasing review times, confirming industry claims that the time has gone up dramatically in the last five years. FDA’s analysis shows that the average decision time for a 510(k) submission increased from 90 days in 2005 to 140 days in 2009. According to the report, 83% of submissions had problems in at least one of the following areas: inadequate device description, discrepancies throughout submission, problems with indications for use, failure to follow or otherwise address current guidance document(s) or recognized standards, or missing performance testing and required clinical data for certain devices.

    Read more:
  • Dearth of Diagnostics Slowing Growth of Personalized Med

    Posted: 21 July 2011

    A lack of a lack of clinically useful diagnostics is hindering the growth of personalized medicines, says a new study from the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. This lack of evidence is leading payers in the US to be skeptical about the evidence linking diagnostic tests to health outcomes. “Scientifically, the process of biomarker discovery and validation in general, and parallel development of drugs and companion diagnostics in particular, has been slow. Additionally, regulatory and reimbursement issues have limited uptake in clinical practice, particularly with respect to companion diagnostics, but also for drugs lacking effective diagnostics,” said Joshua Cohen, PhD, senior research fellow at Tufts and author of the study.

    Read more:
  • FDA Shakes Up Leadership, Hires New Deputy

    Posted: 14 July 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reorganized its top management structure and hired former Dartmouth Medical School Dean Stephen Spielberg as commissioner for medical products and tobacco, a new position. FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg informed agency staff in a letter on Wednesday afternoon. The move is intended to better regulate rapidly changing and increasingly complex products and industries. “The new organizational alignments more accurately reflect the agency's responsibilities, subject matter expertise and mandates in an ever more complex world, where products and services do not fit into a single category,” Hamburg wrote. In addition, Deborah Autor, currently director of the Office of Compliance within the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, has been promoted to deputy commissioner for global regulatory operations and policy.

    Read more:
  • FDA 2011 Drug Approvals on Pace to Top 2010

    Posted: 14 July 2011

    Thus far in 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved 20 new drugs, just one less than the 21 it approved for all of 2010. At this pace, the agency is likely to approve more new types of drugs this year than the previous few years. Testifying before the House Energy and Commerce Committee's health subcommittee, Janet Woodcock, director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, informed lawmakers of FDA drug approvals in response to concerns that FDA may be slowing down the pace of drug approvals due to increased safety concerns. Woodcock testified that FDA meets more than 90% of drug-review deadlines, first-cycle approvals are at a 20-year high and more than two-thirds of new drugs are approved within the six-to-10-month timeframes for New Drug Applications.

    Read more:
  • EMA, FDA Seek Input on Development of Personalized Meds

    Posted: 14 July 2011

    In separate moves, regulators in the both the US and Europe have issued documents regarding the role of personalization in the development of new medicines and are seeking public comments. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week issued a draft guidance proposing that targeted drugs or therapies seeking FDA approval would have to be reviewed simultaneously with their companion diagnostic devices. The draft is open for comment through 12 September. Meanwhile, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued a reflection paper on genomic markers in the development of new drugs. The paper examines the role DNA markers can play in predicting which patients respond to new medications and selecting patients for inclusion in clinical trials. The EMA paper is open for comment until 25 November.

    Read more:
  • Drugmakers Seek Clarity on Off-label Promotion

    Posted: 14 July 2011

    Seven large pharmaceutical companies have filed a Citizen Petition with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asking the agency to clarify its rules regarding communication about drugs’ off-label uses. Communications about medicines’ unapproved or “off-label” uses have long been a problem for drugmakers and have cost some companies hundreds of millions of dollars. Questions about unsolicited requests for information, the use of third-party clinical guidelines and what companies can say to payers about off-label uses for their products remain unresolved. “Unfortunately, the current state of regulatory guidance is not clear or comprehensive, or in some cases, even binding,” wrote lawyers representing Allergan, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sanofi. “That lack of clarity places manufacturers at risk of criminal and civil sanctions if they cannot correctly guess where the government would draw a line.”

    Read more:

June

  • Drug R&D Spending on the Decline

    Posted: 30 June 2011

    The global pharmaceutical industry cut its research spending in 2010 to an estimated $68 billion (US), a 3% decrease. This reflects a growing disillusionment with poor returns on pharmaceutical R&D. According to a new report from Thomson Reuters’ R&D Factbook, the decline was accompanied by a drop in the number of new drug approvals, from 26 in 2009 to just 21 in 2010. The report notes that new Phase I clinical studies fell by 47%, while the number of Phase II studies dropped by more than half. In addition, 55 Phase III clinical studies were halted.

    Read more:
  • 31 Months to Get Drugs Onto Canadian Market

    Posted: 30 June 2011

    A new report says Canada’s federal and provincial governments now take 31 months, on average, to approve new prescription medicines. The report from the Fraser Institute says the federal regulatory, Health Canada, takes an average of nearly 16 months to approve new drugs, while the provincial governments typically spend another 15 months or more to decide whether the drugs will be eligible for reimbursement. Of the new drugs approved as safe and effective by Health Canada in 2004, only 23% had been approved for either full or partial reimbursement under provincial drug plans as of 9 June 2011, compared to 98% that had been covered by at least one private insurer. The report also notes that Health Canada took longer to approve new drugs during 2006-09 than the European Medicines Agency and, in five of the last six years studied (2004-09), performed worse than the US Food and Drug Administration.

    Read more:
  • Senator Calls for Tighter FDA Oversight of Imported APIs

    Posted: 30 June 2011

    Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) is calling on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to tighten oversight on US pharmaceutical companies that import the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) from other countries. This follows a report that revealed more than 80% of APIs used in drugs sold in the US are imported. Senator Brown (D-OH) sent a letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg this week. In it, among other things, he asked about the feasibility of charging fees when pharmaceutical companies move operations overseas to help pay for FDA inspections of those foreign facilities and suggested other fees to help pay for stepped-up oversight.

    Read more:
  • India Attracting Investments, but Little Innovation

    Posted: 30 June 2011

    A report from The Boston Consulting Group found that despite signing research alliances with overseas companies, Indian biopharmaceutical companies continue to play a relatively small role in innovation. More than 70% of 40+ global biopharm executives interviewed for the report are satisfied with their R&D alliances in India, and three out of four expect these activities to increase. However, India currently accounts for only about 1% of overseas research investments by US biopharm companies, compared to Eastern Europe (8%) and Latin America (4%).

    Read more:
  • FDA Acknowledges Problem Monitoring Imports

    Posted: 23 June 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week acknowledged the daunting challenge of monitoring the rapidly increasing number of imports of FDA-regulated products, and announced its plan to alter the agency’s approach to imports. “Global production of FDA-regulated goods has exploded over the past ten years. In addition to an increase in imported finished products, manufacturers increasingly use imported materials and ingredients in their U.S. production facilities, making the distinction between domestic and imported products obsolete,” said FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, in a statement explaining why change is needed. As part of its plan, FDA plans to establish new partnerships with regulators in other countries and increase data-sharing initiatives with those agencies.

    Read more:
  • Joint FDA/EMA Review Pilot Receives First Submission

    Posted: 23 June 2011

    The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have accepted the first application for parallel review under the two agencies’ joint pilot program to evaluate marketing authorization applications involving quality by design (QbD). The pilot was announced in March in an effort to maximize efficiencies among EMA, FDA and drug sponsors. The first application comes from Pfizer. According to an EMA statement, the two regulatory agencies “will communicate with and consult each other regularly during the evaluation process, resulting, if possible, in a common list of questions to the applicant and harmonised evaluation of the applicant's responses.”

    Read more:
  • US Gets Cancer Drugs Before Europe, Says Study

    Posted: 23 June 2011

    Despite perceptions to the contrary, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved more new cancer drugs, and approved them faster, than the European Medicines Agency (EMA), getting the drugs to patients more quickly, according to a new study. Research published in Health Affairs shows that during 2003–10, FDA approved 32 new cancer drugs while EMA approved 26. The median time from marketing submission to approval for all 23 of the drugs approved by both agencies was 182 days for FDA, but 350 days for EMA. “To patients battling cancer, with no treatment options, access to new medicines five-and-a-half months sooner is a very important and potentially life-saving difference,” said Ellen Sigal, of the nonprofit advocacy group, Friends of Cancer Research.

    Read more:
  • Coalition Seeks Social Media, Online Promo Guidelines

    Posted: 23 June 2011

    The lack of online and social media marketing guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration has prompted a group of drugmakers, marketers and Internet players to form a nonprofit coalition to help move toward consensus on standards. The Digital Health Coalition was created by Mark Bard, formerly of Manhattan Research, and includes representatives from Merck, Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Google, Epocrates, HealthCentral, and agencies Edelman and Digitas Health. “A lot of us have ideas about how the industry can evolve. Let's start that conversation,” said Bard, who recently spoke with Pharmalot’s Ed Silverman about the group’s goals and plans.

    Read more:
  • US, EU Agree to Work Together on Drug R&D

    Posted: 16 June 2011

    Europe’s Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) and the US Critical Path Institute (C-Path) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to further their shared mission of reshaping the drug development process to bring safer and more effective products to market more quickly. Both organizations bring together scientists from industry and academia, as well as representatives from patient organizations, small companies and regulatory agencies, in precompetitive public-private partnerships. With this agreement, IMI and C-Path will look for opportunities to leverage one another’s work, further accelerated progress and prevent duplication.

    Read more:
  • FDA Releases Draft Nanotechnology Guidelines

    Posted: 16 June 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued Draft Guidance on Considering Whether an FDA-Regulated Product Involves Application of Nanotechnology, establishing a framework for the regulation and oversight of this emerging science. Some nanotechnology experts have pushed for more explicit guidelines in the nanotechnology field to help spur innovation and commercialization. “With this guidance, we are not announcing a regulatory definition of nanotechnology,” said FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, MD. “However, as a first step, we want to narrow the discussion to these points and work with industry to determine if this focus is an appropriate starting place.”

    Read more:
  • Lawmakers Call for MDUFA Reauthorization to Spur Innovation

    Posted: 16 June 2011

    Two Republican senators are calling for the reauthorization of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA) as a catalyst for changes at the US Food and Drug Administration. In a letter addressed to the heads of life sciences industry organizations, Senators Richard Burr (R-NC) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) wrote that reauthorizing MDUFMA “provides an important opportunity to address the root causes of threats to our nation’s leadership in medical innovation.”

    Read more:
  • ABPI Releases Guidance on Adverse Events and Social Media

    Posted: 16 June 2011

    The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) released Guidance Notes on the Management of Adverse Events and Product Complaints from Pharmaceutical Company Sponsored Websites this week. The guidance provides suggested best practices for monitoring and managing adverse events and product complaints from social media use of company-sponsored websites. It addresses ways pharmaceutical companies may learn of adverse events through social media, suggests that companies should declare their involvement and responsibility for the website, and recommends that company-owned sites provide access to “internal/external reporting based tools which allow users to report suspected adverse drug reactions.”

    Read more:
  • FDA Office of Compliance Promoted to ‘Super Office’

    Posted: 9 June 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Office of Compliance will be elevated to a “Super Office” within the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). The move was reported to be under consideration a few months ago and has now been made official, according to an internal letter to staff from CDER Director Janet Woodcock. “Given CDER/OC’s expanding role, size, and importance in achieving the Agency’s mission of safeguarding the US drug supply, this structural transition makes a great deal of sense,” Woodcock wrote in the letter. “The reorganization will enable Compliance to align its scientific, technical, and legal capabilities with closely related program areas, leveraging our resources and maximizing its ability to achieve its public health mission.” The Office of Compliance will oversee subordinate offices, including four new offices.

    Read more:
  • European Council Adopts Conclusions on Device Innovation

    Posted: 9 June 2011

    The Council of the European Union recently adopted conclusions resulting from a high-level meeting on innovation in the medical device sector held in March. The Council’s conclusions call upon Member States and the European Commission to promote the development of innovative devices to improve patient health and wellbeing throughout the EU. The Council also presented a list of considerations for commissioners to take into account in reviewing and recasting Europe’s Medical Devices Directives, including the importance of the EU’s continued role as a leader in international regulatory convergence and best regulatory practices.

    Read more:
  • FDA Opposes Proposed ‘Hard Science’ Amendment

    Posted: 9 June 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken a strong public stance against an amendment to proposed legislation that would limit the type of information the agency may use in making regulatory decisions. The amendment to an agriculture appropriations bill was offered by Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT) in what Rehberg said is an effort to block FDA from relying on “soft science.” If passed, the amendment would hinder FDA efforts to protect the public from unsafe drugs, tobacco, lead-filled candy and tainted blood, according to FDA documents. “FDA must sometimes act when there are credible risks, but before the weight of scientific evidence has been established,” agency officials wrote in an analysis of the amendment. “This amendment would require that consumers actually be harmed before FDA can take certain actions to protect the public health.”

    Read more:
  • India Proposes Crackdown on Doctor Gifts

    Posted: 9 June 2011

    India’s Department of Pharmaceuticals has presented a draft code of marketing practices for the pharmaceutical industry that would, among other things, ban gifts from drugmakers to doctors. It also would require third parties working for drugmakers, including advertising agency personnel, consultants and others, to have a “good working knowledge” of the rules. The proposal follows on the heels of similar efforts in the US. However, the proposed rules are a bit more lenient regarding industry-sponsored continuing medical education, allowing some travel expenses, meals and refreshments, accommodations and registration fees for events held in India to be paid for by drugmakers.

    Read more:
  • CBO Report Says DTC Ad Ban Could Be Bad for Consumers

    Posted: 2 June 2011

    A report from the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) examining the potential impact of a two-year ban on direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising for new drugs found the proposed ban would likely have little impact on prices and could be harmful to consumers. The CBO report, entitled Potential Effects of a Ban on Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of New Prescription Drugs, determined that such a DTC advertising moratorium would not have much of an effect on drug prices since brand-name drugs comprise such a small portion of the retail prescription drug market. The report also warned that a ban could prove harmful to patients, with fewer people seeking treatment as a result of being exposed to drug advertisements, and by creating a disincentive to innovation as it could make the marketing of novel, first-in-class drugs that typically receive heavy promotion less profitable.

    Read more:
  • Proposal Would Compel Drugmakers to Warn FDA of Shortages

    Posted: 2 June 2011

    Growing public concern over drug shortages has led to proposed legislation that would require drugmakers to give the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advance warning of pending shortages. Supporters say the Preserving Access to Life-Saving Medications Act, which is currently under consideration by a Senate committee, would enable FDA to alert hospitals and healthcare providers in advance so they could make provisions. “It minimizes the pressure that is on pharmacists, doctors and other healthcare providers and increases manufacturer accountability,” said Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) this week, speaking at the University of Rochester Medical Center.

    Read more:
  • EMA, Heads of Med. Agencies Release Transparency Guidance

    Posted: 2 June 2011

    The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA) of EU Member States have jointly released a draft guidance document on information transparency related to marketing authorization applications (MAAs). The document covers the types of information included in MAAs that can be released to the public, and that which is commercially confidential or protected personal data. Stakeholders and the public may submit comments on the draft document until 1 September.

    Read more:
  • Device Maker Sues FDA Over Revoked 510(k) Clearance

    Posted: 2 June 2011

    A small medical device maker whose knee implant was cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only to have that clearance later revoked has filed suit against the agency. New Jersey-based ReGen Biologics filed the lawsuit this week in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, calling FDA's rescission of its original 510(k) clearance of the company’s Menaflex Collagen Meniscus Implant unlawful, arbitrary and capricious. FDA cleared the device in 2008, despite reported objections from FDA scientists. Officials reviewing the original decision later found that lobbying by four New Jersey congressmen and ex-FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach had influenced the agency’s decision to clear the device.

    Read more:

May

  • 510(k) Process Unpredictable, Europe Preferred for Device Approval

    Posted: 26 May 2011

    The unpredictability of the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) 510(k) clearance process for medical devices is increasingly leading device makers, particularly smaller ones, to pursue approvals in Europe first, says a new report. The study conducted by researchers from Northwestern University and funded by the nonprofit Institute for Health Technology Studies (InHealth), surveyed more than 350 professionals engaged in medical device development. Speaking at the press conference announcing the study results, Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, head of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said that it “validates actions we are already taking” to improve the 510(k) system, but also pointed to “limitations” of the study, in that the survey’s 350 respondents represent less than 10% of the device industry.

    Read more:
  • $285 Million in FDA Budget Cuts on the Table

    Posted: 26 May 2011

    A US House of Representatives subcommittee this week proposed cutting $285 million in funding for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), an 11.5% decrease. While FDA funding comes from industry-paid user fees as well as from Congress, the cuts would force the already heavily burdened FDA to assess its priorities and maximize efficiencies. Altogether, FDA’s total budget next year, including both fees and Congressional funding, would be $3.7 billion.

    Read more:
  • FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Financial Disclosures

    Posted: 26 May 2011

    In the latest effort to oversee and minimize conflicts of interest among drugmakers and the clinical investigators involved in drug development, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued draft guidance on financial disclosure rules for investigators. The guidance document is intended to update rules that have been in place for a decade. “During the intervening years, interest has grown in the public disclosure of industry financial arrangements with physicians,” according to the agency, and “FDA is striving to achieve a proper balance between transparency and the right to privacy of clinical investigators with respect to their financial arrangements as expressed in the agency’s protection of privacy regulation.

    Read more:
  • Web Companies Implicated in Illegal Drug Ad Deals

    Posted: 26 May 2011

    Late last week, it was reported that online search and advertising giant Google had been repeatedly warned about questionable online drug sellers illegally advertising on its network and had set aside $500 million for a possible fine from the US Department of Justice. On the heels of that story, this week, it was reported that other large web companies such as Microsoft and Yahoo! may have engaged in the same practices. At issue are ads for online pharmacies outside the US promising to ship prescription drugs to US consumers without proof of prescription. The authenticity of the drugs is often in question and they may be shipped in unmarked packages designed to clear customs without raising suspicions.

    Read more:
  • EU Doctors Call for Tougher Device Regulations

    Posted: 19 May 2011

    A group of doctors from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has raised concern over the EU’s oversight of medical devices and called for tougher standards. Writing in the European Heart Journal, the group, led by Alan Fraser of Cardiff University, wrote, “The regulatory system has not kept pace with technological advances and changing patterns of medical practice,” and criticized device makers for a practice they call “forum shopping” to take advantage of differing regulatory standards among EU Member States. The ESC doctors say the current regulatory system puts patients’ lives in jeopardy, and they call for an extensive overhaul that includes a single, coordinated system for device evaluation and approval in the EU.

    Read more:
  • Pharma Spending to Decline as Generics Gain Market Share

    Posted: 19 May 2011

    Global pharmaceutical spending will reach almost $1.1 trillion (US) by 2015, according to a new report, but the growth of such spending will decline as brand-name drugs continue to lose market share to generics. The report from the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics predicts average annual spending growth slowing to between 3% and 6%, compared with 6.2% during the past five years. Spending on brand-name drugs in developed markets is expected to remain flat while their global market share continues to fall to 53%, compared with 64% in 2010 and 70% in 2005. “There are unprecedented dynamics at play, which are driving rapid shifts in the mix of spending by patients and payers between branded products and generics,” said Murray Aitken of IMS Health.

    Read more:
  • A Call for Ethical Trial Standards as Part of Marketing Apps

    Posted: 19 May 2011

    This week, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published its report covering the discussions and comments made on its draft reflection paper on ethical and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) aspects of clinical trials in countries outside the EU. The discussions took place during an international workshop of stakeholders from 43 countries in September of last year. A number of participants called for marketing applications to include more information related to clinical trial ethics and said that applications should be rejected if there are serious violations. “Serious non-compliance with ethical guidelines should have serious consequences. This should be made clear and a range of regulatory options established to enable proportionate action to be taken,” according to the EMA report.

    Read more:
  • Rethinking Clinical Trials

    Posted: 19 May 2011

    The conventional process of developing a biopharmaceutical product includes taking it through randomized clinical trial (RCT) Phases 1 through 3, but there may be reasons to rethink how clinical trials are conducted and, perhaps, inject more flexibility into the process. The traditional clinical trial is entrenched because it is so effective in determining whether the given product has some effect, but it also has limitations, including its essentially binary nature, where the outcome is regarded as either passed or failed, according to Les Rose, a freelance clinical consultant and medical writer. “The real world is not like that,” observes Rose. “RCTs are not great at quantifying the effect size, and hence the treatment’s impact on normal clinical practice. For this reason, there has been much emphasis in recent years on ‘pragmatic’ trials which have less stringent selection criteria, and attempt to model the real world more realistically,” he writes.

    Read more:
  • FDA Proposes User Fees for Biosimilars, Seeks Input

    Posted: 12 May 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has promised to issue guidance on applications for biosimilar products this year and is seeking input on the agency’s proposed user-fee system for such applications. The move represents another step in FDA’s task of developing a regulatory pathway for biosimilars. The proposed user-fee system is similar to the one currently in place for brand-name pharmaceuticals under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA). FDA estimates the biosimilar product-development fee amount would be around $150,000. According to the notice published this week in the Federal Register, the user fee is necessary to support the increased review capacity needed. Comments must be submitted to FDA by 9 June 2011.

    Read more:
  • Chile to Create New Drug Regulatory Agency

    Posted: 12 May 2011

    In a move supported by multinational drugmakers, the parliament of Chile will consider legislation to establish a new national medicines agency. Chile’s Health Minister has said he is sending the legislative proposal to parliament that would create the new Agencia Nacional de Medicamentos (Anamed). Anamed would assume regulatory responsibilities over drugs from the National Institute of Public Health. Drugmakers have criticized Chile’s regulatory system, citing ineffective patent enforcement and failure to adequately implement data protection as major areas of concern.

    Read more:
  • FDA Pharmacogenomics Program Encourages Innovation

    Posted: 12 May 2011

    When the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) created a pathway for voluntary submission of pharmacogenomic data, the program was initially greeted with skepticism by those who feared FDA would use the data to add more product restrictions. But there is evidence the program has been a success for FDA and that it has helped advance the use of pharmacogenomics in drug regulation, allowing the agency to better keep pace with industry innovations. FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Director Janet Woodcock recently cited the program as an example of the importance of funding regulatory science at FDA and called it “wildly successful.” While the program is still fairly modest, it has helped make the pharmacogenomic data which are increasingly used in drug development a more common part of the product review process, as well.

    Read more:
  • Counterfeit Drugs a Serious Global Problem

    Posted: 12 May 2011

    The production and distribution of counterfeit medicines is a growing problem around the world, say officials at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “Globally, counterfeit drugs are a big concern,” said Ilisa Bernstein, a deputy director with FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and an expert on counterfeit drugs during an report this week on CBS News’ The Early Show. According to the report, Internet sales are the most common channel for fake drugs, and FDA has recently identified nearly 300 websites the agency suspects of selling counterfeit drugs to consumers and ordered them to stop. FDA advises consumers to look for the Verified Internet Pharmacy Practice Sites (VIPPS) seal when shopping for drugs online and is working with drugmakers and pharmacies to develop a tracking system that will help verify legitimate medicines.

    Read more:
  • FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Device Reprocessing

    Posted: 5 May 2011

    In an effort to reduce the risk of infection from reusable medical devices that have been improperly reprocessed, the US Food and Drug Administration(FDA) has released a draft guidance on proper reprocessing procedures and announced a public workshop on the subject to take place 8–9 June. FDA said in a statement that “the risk of acquiring an infection from a reprocessed device is relatively low and that the benefits of these important devices outweigh their risks.” As an example, the agency cited endoscopes, which are involved in 10 million medical procedures per year, and noted FDA had received 80 reports of inadequate reprocessing and 28 reports of infections related to endoscopes during the three-year period, 2007–10. The draft guidance is currently open for public comment. When final, it will replace a document from 1996.

    Read more:
  • FTC Voices Concern Over Rise in Generics Settlement Deals

    Posted: 5 May 2011

    Branded drugmakers entered into an unprecedented number of so-called “pay-for-delay” deals with generic drugmakers last year, according to the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Such deals, in which the makers of a branded medicine pay generics companies to defer the introduction of lower-cost, generic versions, rose more than 60%, from 19 deals in Fiscal 2009 to 31 in 2010. FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, an outspoken critic of these types of agreements, said they “are outrageous, and they harm consumers,” and called for Congress or the courts to step in to stop them. “The increasing number of these deals is a win-win proposition for the pharmaceutical industry, but a lose-lose for everyone else,” said Leibowitz. Pharmaceutical industry representatives counter that the deals, which are legal, provide a way to cut legal costs and curtail lawsuits that could drag on for years, further delaying introduction of generics to the market.

    Read more:
  • Increased Focus on Misuse of OTC Meds

    Posted: 5 May 2011

    Concern over misuse of over-the-counter (OTC) medications is on the rise and both regulators and drugmakers are taking steps to prevent misuse. Recent major OTC drug recalls have put a spotlight on risks associated with common medications available without a prescription, and studies show many consumers have limited knowledge of the OTC medicines they take. Only 41% of the respondents to one survey said they read the labels of their medications, and most could not name the active ingredients in several popular OTC drugs. For example, only 31% knew Tylenol contained acetaminophen. Regulators and manufacturers are giving OTC drugs a closer look and responding with some new standards and formulations. Just this week, the US Food and Drug Administration released new guidelines for liquid OTC medicines and drugmakers announced they would eliminate acetaminophen from OTC drugs for infants to limit risk of overdose.

    Read more:
  • Regulatory Talent Highly Sought After by Biotechs

    Posted: 5 May 2011

    Regulatory and clinical jobs are among the most sought-after in the biotech world, say biotech staffing experts in comments published this week in FierceBiotech. “We're getting the most calls for experts in clinical development, medical affairs and regulatory affairs. That's the pathway where companies make and break their firms,” said one recruiter. In today’s regulatory climate, with biosimilars, increased focus on drug safety, and increased ambiguity over the regulatory requirements themselves, regulatory professionals who combine strategic thinking, regulatory knowledge and people skills are highly valued, the experts said. The comments are consistent with RAPS’ own research from its most recent Scope of Practice & Compensation Report for the Regulatory Profession, that shows regulatory professionals are increasingly called upon to weigh in on business and strategy. RAPS will soon publish the first in a series of special reports on regulatory talent management, based on additional analysis of the Scope of Practice data.

    Read more:

April

  • FDA Partners With Industry to Improve Excipient Screening

    Posted: 28 April 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has teamed with the makers of pharmaceutical excipients in an effort to speed up and improve its monitoring of the pharmaceutical supply chain. The agency is working with IPEC Americas, an industry group representing excipient manufacturers, to quickly identify and prevent counterfeit, contaminated or mislabeled substances from entering the supply chain. The partners will create a comprehensive library of excipient samples to be used as reference standards in screening pharmaceutical ingredients and finished medicines. FDA inspectors will use portable devices to examine substances and compare the results against the reference standards, and also to detect contaminants.

    Read more:
  • FDA to Examine Influence of Drugmakers’ Websites

    Posted: 28 April 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will conduct a series of studies to evaluate consumer reactions to prescription-drug websites. The three studies, officially announced in today's Federal Register, will ask participants to answer questions after viewing different versions of a website for a fictitious drug. The studies will “test different ways of presenting prescription drug risk and benefit information on branded drug Web sites” and will “complement qualitative research we plan to conduct on issues surrounding social media,” according to the notice. FDA will accept public comments on the plan until 27 June.

    Read more:
  • International Consortium to Push for Rare Disease Treatments

    Posted: 28 April 2011

    An international consortium of patient advocacy groups, researchers, regulators and funders has set an ambitious goal of developing 200 new therapies for rare diseases by 2020. Currently, there are treatments for just 200 of the approximately 7,000 diseases affecting small patient populations and little financial incentive for drugmakers to develop new treatments without additional enticements. The International Rare Disease Research Consortium intendes to foster “unprecedented cooperation at the international level” to promote work on treatments to help those suffering such illnesses. The Group met recently to define the framework for its efforts and will meet again in October 2011

    Read more:
  • Mass. Lawmakers Vote to Repeal Medical Industry Gift Ban

    Posted: 28 April 2011

    The Massachusetts House of Representatives voted 128–22 to repeal the state’s so-called “gift ban” that prohibited medical and pharmaceutical companies from giving certain gifts to doctors and required disclosure of some that were allowed. The law went into effect in 2008 and bans gifts including meals, event tickets and even promotional items such as pens, and it requires companies to report other types of gifts valued at more than $50 Supporters of the repeal contend the ban has been bad for business in the Commonwealth, saying it discouraged businesses considering expanding in Massachusetts and caused two medical conventions to decide against coming to the state. Even restaurant advocates said the law had a negative impact on their revenues from catering functions for healthcare product companies.

    Read more:
  • Adverse Event Reports Up Dramatically in Past Decade

    Posted: 7 April 2011

    Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have increased dramatically over the past decade, according to new research from the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. The report examines FDA’s adverse events data since 1969 and found that 55% of all ADRs had been reported between 2000 and 2010. Lead researcher Sheila Weiss Smith cautioned that the reports do not accurately reflect the actual number of reactions as many go unreported, and also emphasized what she feels is the findings’ most important takeaway: the need for better quality reporting. Researchers found many reports lacked needed information, including one-third that failed to document the patient’s age, a critical piece of data. “Without ages, you have to throw out those reports,” said Weiss Smith.

    Read more:
  • UK Drugmakers Get Informal Social Media Guidelines

    Posted: 7 April 2011

    The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the body responsible for UK drugmakers’ self-imposed standards, has issued some informal guidelines on the use of digital communications, including social media. The move comes just after the US Food and Drug Administration’s announcement that it will again delay release of its promised guidance on social media promotion. However, the PMCPA guidelines are not new rules amending UK pharma’s self-regulatory Code of Practice for the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI). Instead, PMCPA created a Q&A document clarifying how to use digital communications tools while adhering to existing regulations.

    Read more:
  • IOM Seeks Device Makers’ Input on 510(k)

    Posted: 7 April 2011

    Now that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has completed its review of the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA's) 510(k) clearance process, the review panel is looking to gather input on its findings from the medical device industry. The move may help assuage complaints that device makers have been under-represented in IOM’s review and FDA’s overall 510(k) reform process. “I would argue IOM recommendations shouldn’t have any bearing, because of a lack of expertise on the committee,” said Mark Leahey, president of the Medical Device Manufacturers Association. A vast majority of medical devices are cleared for market in the US through the 510(k) protocol.

    Read more:
  • FDA Won’t Stop Pharmacists From Drug Compounding

    Posted: 7 April 2011

    Last week, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it would not take steps to prevent pharmacies from selling a compounded version of hydroxyprogesterone caproate, a drug to prevent preterm birth. The move was unusual as FDA generally does not allow compounded versions of commercially available medicines. The agency’s announcement comes in response to the uproar over cease-and-desist letters sent to pharmacies from KV Pharmaceutical, which had won FDA approval and seven years of exclusive rights under the Orphan Drug Act for a manufactured version of the drug that has been compounded in local pharmacies for years. After FDA approved KV’s version, the company initially set the price for its drug at $1,500 per injection ($30,000 for 20-week course), compared with $10–$20 per dose for the pharmacy version. The company later lowered the price to $690 per dose. FDA’s statement noted that it would not take enforcement action “unless the compounded products are unsafe, of substandard quality, or are not being compounded in accordance with appropriate standards.”

    Read more:

March

  • Biosimilars Market to Grow to $3.7 Billion by 2015

    Posted: 31 March 2011

    Worldwide sales of biosimilar medicines will grow from $243 million (US) in 2010 to $3.7 billion by 2015, according to a new study from market analysis firm Datamonitor. The report notes that there still are a number of obstacles to commercial success for biosimilar products despite the establishment of regulatory approval pathways in the US, EU and Japan. However, more than 30 innovative biologics worth $51 billion in sales are set to lose patent protection between 2011 and 2015, and biosimilars represent a “high-value proposition” as government and private payers seek increased value and savings on drug costs.

    Read more:
  • FDA Issues Recommendations to Device Importers

    Posted: 31 March 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s)Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) has issued recommendations to medical device importers to help improve the import entry review processes and ease entry of needed medical technology products into the US. Citing increasing concern over the number of imported devices lacking adequate data needed by FDA for timely admission into the country, CDRH Director of Compliance Steven Silverman issued a letter to industry last week. “Without the proper information, USFDA may initiate a manual review of each line of your entry, which may lead to delays in its release to the importer/consignee,” wrote Silverman.

    Read more:
  • FDA Contemplating Drug Safety ‘Super Office’

    Posted: 31 March 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reportedly exploring the creation of a new position within its Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) that would oversee all of the agency’s multiple drug safety initiatives. It is not known whether the position is intended to oversee a new drug safety office or if FDA is simply looking to fill the vacant position of associate director of safety policy and communication. According to a story in The RPM Report, FDA’s goals for the proposed “super office” are to “elevate the visibility of CDER’s safety functions,” and “provide the CDER director with more support.”

    Read more:
  • EU Herbal Medicine Ban to Face Legal Challenge

    Posted: 31 March 2011

    A ban on unregistered herbal medicines in the EU set to go into effect in May will face legal challenges from natural health advocates. Critics of the EU's Traditional Herbal Medicinal Products Directive, originally passed in 2004, say it will be difficult to implement the law fairly and that it could actually expose more people to fraudulent and possibly unsafe herbal remedies. "We plan to challenge the directive first of all in the High Court in London, on the grounds that it is disproportionate, non-transparent and discriminatory. We then hope to have the case referred to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg,” said Dr. Robert Verkerk, executive and scientific director of the Alliance for Natural Health.

    Read more:
  • WHO H1N1 Response Not Influenced by Drugmakers, Says Report

    Posted: 10 March 2011

    A panel of independent experts who examined the actions taken by the World Health Organization (WHO) in response to last year’s H1N1 pandemic found no evidence of drug industry influence on the agency's decisions. However, the panel also said WHO performed poorly in managing conflicts of interest among some experts on its advisory Emergency Committee with ties to pharmaceutical companies. Criticism of WHO’s response was fueled largely by its refusal to disclose the identities of Emergency Committee members.

    Read more:
  • FDA Panel Says Docs Should Oversee Genetic Testing

    Posted: 10 March 2011

    A US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel recommends genetic tests marketed directly to consumers require a doctor's supervision. Direct-to-consumer tests are largely marketed online and allow individuals to get genetic information directly from a lab without the involvement of a doctor or healthcare provider. But such personal tests can produce ambiguous or misleading results without expert interpretation and analysis, panel members said.

    Read more:
  • US Supreme Court Rejects Patent Challenge

    Posted: 10 March 2011

    The US Supreme Court’s decision not to hear a challenge to a drug patent settlement reached more than a decade ago marks a setback for opposition to so-called “pay-for-delay” patent settlements. The court refused to revisit the deal between Bayer and Barr Pharmaceuticals on the antibiotic Cipro, which has been the subject of intense scrutiny. Critics, including President Obama and US Federal Trade Commission officials have argued such deals are anticompetitive and should be banned.

    Read more:
  • Canada’s Drug Access Bill Moves Closer to Passage

    Posted: 10 March 2011

    Canada’s House of Commons approved a bill intended to remove restrictions on generic drugmakers exporting versions of patented medicines to developing nations at cheaper prices. Brandname drugmakers oppose the measure, saying it could undermine intellectual property rights. The current bill, which would amend the “access-to-medicines” law originally enacted in 2004, still must be approved by Canada’s Senate before it can become law.

    Read more:
  • GHTF to Be Terminated

    Posted: 3 March 2011

    The 18-year-old Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF), devoted to facilitating greater uniformity among national and regional medical device regulatory systems, will terminate its existence, according to a report in the Medical Technology Association of Australia’s PulseLine. At a recent meeting, regulators from GHTF’s founding member countries—US, EU, Japan, Canada and Australia—decided to terminate the task force, and have proposed replacing GHTF with a global regulator-only body in the future. Information on this development has yet to be posted on the public GHTF website.

    Read more:
  • FDA Cracks Down on More Than 500 Unapproved Rx Drugs

    Posted: 3 March 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week took action against drugmakers manufacturing and marketing more than 500 unapproved prescription drugs used to treat colds, coughs and allergies. The affected products have never been evaluated by FDA for safety and effectiveness and cannot be legally marketed in the US but continue to be prescribed. Many of the unapproved drugs predate the 1962 federal law requiring drugs to undergo FDA review. “We don’t know what’s in them, whether they work properly or how they are made,” said Deborah Autor, director of the Office of Compliance in FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

    Read more:
  • Drugmakers Frustrated by India’s Slow Clinical Trial Approval Process

    Posted: 3 March 2011

    Large international pharmaceutical companies are becoming increasingly frustrated with lengthy delays in getting regulatory approval to conduct clinical trials in India. Drugmakers complain that their applications are getting stalled for months in the office of the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI). In some cases, applications have been delayed for more than six months and drugmakers have been forced to cancel trials in India and pursue other sites. The number of global trials in India has been stable at about 250 approvals per year for the last three years, but drug company officials warn that this number could decline if approvals continue to be delayed inordinately.

    Read more:
  • Too Few Women in Heart Device Studies, Says Report

    Posted: 3 March 2011

    Many heart devices are approved for use in the US despite a lack of data on safety and effectiveness for women and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements. According to research from the American Heart Association, two-thirds of participants in studies used to gain FDA approval for cardiac medical devices were men and more than a quarter of the trials did not disclose the gender of study participants. According to an FDA spokeswoman, the agency is aware the problem and FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health is currently developing formal guidelines to be made available this year.

    Read more:

February

  • Hamburg Says Biosimilar Rules Coming Soon, Backs Generic User Fees

    Posted: 24 February 2011

    US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Margaret Hamburg told a gathering of generic drugmakers last week that the agency will issue rules for reviewing biosimilar medicines “very soon,” and that she supports user fees to help speed up the review of generic drugs. US healthcare reform passed last year included a provision authorizing an approval process for biosimilars and FDA has been working to create that process. Hamburg said that different models have been discussed and the agency is close to being ready to formally implement its new process. She also expressed support for a user fee program for generic drug applications similar to the one that has been in place for New Drug Applications since 1992.

    Read more:
  • Shuren Fires Back at Critics Who Say FDA Device Review Too Slow

    Posted: 24 February 2011

    During a recent hearing before US lawmakers, Jeffrey Shuren, director of the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health, responded to criticism of the agency’s review process for medical devices. While some have charged that FDA clears too many devices without thorough review, others have complained that the process is too slow, particularly compared with the equivalent process for devices marketed in Europe. “Just because a technology is available in another country doesn't mean it works or even that it's necessarily safe,” said Shuren, who placed blame on device companies for the declining quality of the applications submitted.

    Read more:
  • India Plans Anti-counterfeiting Measures

    Posted: 24 February 2011

    The Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) is moving forward with ambitious plans to guard against counterfeit medicines in its drug supply chain. The Drug Consultative Committee has proposed that all drugs sold in India be required to carry a unique identifier (UID) bar code and a user-readable code that would allow consumers to verify a drug’s authenticity through text messaging. The move follows an earlier requirement for all drugs produced in India for export to carry bar codes by July 2011. However, some smaller Indian drugmakers oppose the requirement, fearing it will be too costly.

    Read more:
  • FDA Review Process Hampers Innovation, Says Study

    Posted: 24 February 2011

    A new report charges that the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) review process for drugs and medical devices is “increasingly unpredictable” and negatively affecting innovation and investment in the healthcare product sector and damaging public health. The report from the California Healthcare Institute and The Boston Consulting Group points to review times that have increased 28% for drugs and 43% for devices compared with the 2003–07 period. “Reversing present regulatory trends is essential to sustaining the US biomedical industry as a vibrant source of technology jobs and encouraging future advances to improve public health,” say the report’s authors.

    Read more:
  • FDA Proposes Plan to Speed Review of Innovative Devices

    Posted: 10 February 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week proposed a new “innovation pathway” initiative that would speed agency review of innovative medical devices. The initiative is one way FDA aims to help get revolutionary treatments to patients more quickly. Under the proposal, review time for such products would be cut roughly in half. “We must assure that our oversight doesn’t stifle innovation but rather encourages innovation, while maintaining a commitment to safety and effectiveness upon which Americans rely,’’ said Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, director of FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. FDA will hold a public meeting on the initiative in March and will accept comments through 11 April.

    Read more:
  • India Seeks to Ease Export of Generic Drugs to Japan

    Posted: 10 February 2011

    India is seeking to ease rules for exporting generic drugs to Japan as part of ongoing economic trade negotiations. Japan, the world’s second largest drug market behind the US, opened doors for cheaper generic drugs in 2007 in an effort to cut rising healthcare costs for its aging population. But steep regulatory hurdles have made it difficult for foreign companies to make inroads into the Japanese market thus far. Indian drugmakers want to ease requirements, including allowing drug approval applications in English and a relaxation of mandatory trial requirements for every drug on the local population, as well as more transparency and a quicker approval process.

    Read more:
  • ‘Black Box’ Warnings Applied Inconsistently, Says Study

    Posted: 10 February 2011

    So-called “black box” safety warnings, the strongest tool the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has to communicate drug risks to consumers, are applied inconsistently according to a new study. Researchers examined 20 different drug classes covering a total of 176 medications and found inconsistencies in how the warnings were displayed in nine drug classes, with 15 specific warnings not uniformly evident on the labeling of all drugs within each specific class. “Our findings imply that the process of black box warning acquisition requires transparent and systematic rules, as well as clear justification for the presence of, or lack of evidence for, specific major risks for individual drugs,” said lead researcher, Orestis Panagiotou.

    Read more:
  • FDA Approves First iPhone App

    Posted: 10 February 2011

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a new mobile radiology application that will allow healthcare professionals to view medical images on an iPhone or iPad. It is the first FDA-approved diagnostic radiology application for mobile devices. The agency's decision appears to signal a step toward more direct regulation of mobile-based medical technology, a rapidly growing sector. More than 1,500 healthcare-related mobile apps are already available to both professionals and consumers.

    Read more:
  • Anti-counterfeiting Measures Hinder Drug Access

    Posted: 3 February 2011

    According to Oxfam, the EU and US are using substandard medicines as an excuse to tighten intellectual property (IP) rules, boosting pharmaceutical industry profits while making it harder for the poor to access drugs. Fighting counterfeits by expanding IP does not address the public health threat of substandard and falsified drugs, claims the organization, arguing that such moves could limit access to generic medicines. Oxfam released its “Eye on the Ball” report Wednesday at the Sixth Global Congress on Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy.

    Read more:
  • BHF Funds Research to “Mend Broken Hearts”

    Posted: 3 February 2011

    The British Heart Foundation (BHF) on Tuesday launched a £50 million ($80 million US) research project into the potential of stem cells to regenerate heart tissue. Scientists hope to have experimental drugs in development within the next decade that would enable certain kinds of cells in the heart the ability to regenerate tissue, repair damage and combat heart failure.

    Read more:
  • 2011 Bad, 2012 Worse for Patent Expirations

    Posted: 3 February 2011

    While the pharmaceutical industry may think 2011 will be bad for patent expirations, 2012 will be even worse according to a report from EvaluatePharma’s EP Vantage Unit. The groups analysis reveals a "staggering $33.2 billion of sales will be exposed to generics in 2012 in the USA alone, more than double this year’s figure, representing "a true annus horribilis." The report, which focuses on the US, also notes that the rate of erosion of branded sales "is set to remain incredibly high until 2015" and "the big picture is one of painful losses to sales and earnings, the scale of which the industry has never seen before".

    Read more:
  • California Stem Cell Agency Creating Jobs

    Posted: 3 February 2011

    According to a report released recently by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), the $1.1 billion from California taxpayers is generating 2,739 jobs annually. Most of the positions are new scientists, assistant and lab technicians and jobs linked to the construction of new research facilities. “This report demonstrates that we’ve delivered on the economic promise (of the funding program) today, even as we continue to see strong positive milestones on the research side progressing rapidly toward therapies,” said Robert Klein, chairman of CIRM’s governing board.

    Read more:

January

Past Archives