Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 24 November 2020 | By Mary Ellen Schneider
The World Health Organization is revising its guidance to industry on good manufacturing practices for investigational drug products, including new recommendations for quality risk management.
The draft working document, which was released in November 2020, is open for public comment until 6 January 2021. The draft is expected to be revised and go through a second round of public comment before being presented to the WHO’s Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations in late 2021. The draft guideline is an update to recommendations issued by WHO in 1996.
The guideline update comes at the request of the WHO’s Prequalification Team – Inspections Services, in part to account for new manufacturing situations arising from the production of COVID-19 therapeutics.
“The objective of this update is to bring the guideline in line with current expectations and trends in good manufacturing practices and to harmonize the text with the principles from other related international guidelines,” according to the WHO draft guideline.
The draft guideline, which applies to investigational products that may not fall under the same legal umbrella as licensed products, covers quality management, quality risk management, personnel, documentation, premises, equipment and utilities, materials, production, quality control, qualification and validation, complaints, recalls, returns, shipping, and destruction.
In the guideline, manufacturers are tasked with establishing a system for quality risk management. “The system for quality risk management should cover a systematic process for the assessment, control, communication and review of risks to the quality of the product and, ultimately, to the protection of the trial subject and patient,” according to the WHO draft guideline.
The risk management system should ensure that the risk evaluation is based on science and experience with the process and the product. WHO also calls on manufacturers to retain records related to risk management and to match the formality of the program to the level of risk. Quality risk management “should be applied both proactively and retrospectively,” WHO wrote.
The draft guideline also notes that risk assessment should guide the scope of qualification and validation required for investigational products.
The guideline also beefs up recommendations related to managing complaints, including calling on manufacturers to establish a written procedure for how complaints are managed, and for complaints to be recorded and investigated. Manufacturers should inform competent authorities if they are considering taking any action following identification of a serious quality problem.
Manufacturers should also establish a written procedure describing the management of any recall of an investigational product, the draft guideline said.
WHO
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.