• RF Quarterly

    Medical device quality management systems

    Introduction A quality management system (QMS) is one of the five medical device conformity assessment elements. 1 Manufacturers of medical devices are expected to implement, document, and maintain a QMS that “ensures the medical devices it designs, manufactures, and supplies to the market are safe, perform as intended, and comply with the relevant provisions of the regulations in the countries where the product is made available.” 2   Today, a QMS is seen as a ...
  • RF Quarterly

    Medical device compliance and postmarketing activities

    This article provides an overview of medical device postmarketing requirements. These requirements include, but are not limited to, establishment registration, medical device reporting, and device tracking. Additional requirements include postmarket surveillance studies required under Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) Section 522 and postapproval studies required at the time of approval of certain application types.   Introduction: Establishment registra...
  • RF Quarterly

    PMS and the role of CAPA in the medical device regulatory cycle: A Saudi perspective

    It is important for both medical device manufacturers and regulators to establish robust postmarketing surveillance (PMS) of devices to ensure their continued safe use. The PMS system should include reactive and proactive components, that is, vigilance and safety signals assessments. Applying corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) as a part of the quality management system improves the quality and safety aspects of the manufactured medical devices. This article examines...
  • Feature ArticlesFeature Articles

    Strategies for managing regulatory risk with third-party distributors

    In today’s global healthcare distribution market, an increasing number of medical device and in vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD) companies are aspiring to market globally. One of the main challenges these manufacturers face is how to register and distribute their products internationally. While direct distribution channels may be feasible for larger multinational corporations, third-party distribution brings its own advantages, and is becoming the norm in today’s land...
  • Feature ArticlesFeature Articles

    Strategic lifecycle approach to medical device regulation

    The purpose of this article is to highlight new facets of EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) in the medical device industry. The article contains references to both MDR legal articles and recommendations that will challenge organizations to take a more holistic viewpoint of their products, resources, and regulatory toolkit to be compliant in the EU.   Introduction The application date of 2017/745 MDR 1 is 26 May 2021, when it will officially supersede the 93/42/EC...
  • Regulatory NewsRegulatory News

    Federal officials design new mask guidelines to better protect more workers

    Federal officials announced new measures to help get fresh, new N95 masks to health care workers and expand their use in other industries after scientists argued that the highly protective masks are essential to keep workers safe from covid-19. The changes come as US mask-makers say the demand from hospitals is so sluggish that they’ve laid off 2,000 workers and fear some new protective gear companies could collapse. Yet in a letter to lawmakers, hospitals cite ongoing c...
  • Feature ArticlesFeature Articles

    Communication of regulatory intelligence: A survey of the medical device industry

    Regulatory intelligence activities are complicated by the push for stronger product sales in emerging markets, where medical device regulations can change rapidly or be confusing and even contradictory. Understanding how, when, and with whom to communicate the new or changing regulatory information within a medical device company affects global market strategy and product success. The research reported here examined how medical device companies structure their regulatory i...
  • Regulatory NewsRegulatory News

    MCIT: Not a better way to pay for breakthrough devices

    The Medicare Coverage of Innovative Technology (MCIT) pathway should be rescinded because it does not require thorough evidence of the safety and efficacy of the medical device for which it aims to provide coverage, Vinay K. Rathi, MD, of Harvard Medical School and colleagues wrote in a perspective published in the New England Journal of Medicine .   MCIT would provide up to four years of Medicare coverage for medical devices authorized under the US Food and Drug Admi...
  • Feature ArticlesFeature Articles

    Transforming regulatory strategy to meet the evolving compliance landscape

    Changes in industry regulations are now viewed as one of the top three disruptive business trends facing pharmaceutical and life sciences organizations today. These same pressures are extending to the medical device market. In this article, the authors explore how perception of regulatory compliance is evolving due to a variety of driving forces. They outline the role digital transformation can play in helping pharmaceutical companies meet new regulatory compliance demands...
  • Regulatory NewsRegulatory News

    FDA posts final guidance on device-specific performance criteria

    FDA has released three device-specific guidance documents detailing performance criteria in support of its Safety and Performance Based Pathway. The texts cover magnetic resonance (MR) receive-only coils, spinal plating systems and non-spinal metallic bone screws.   Last year, FDA published guidance on the optional Safety and Performance Based Pathway. The text set out the agency’s thinking on a pathway intended to enable companies to show a new product is as safe ...
  • Regulatory NewsRegulatory News

    Study calls for proactive surveillance of device AEs

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relies mainly on direct reports and regulator-initiated surveillance to flag safety concerns around medical devices, a system that may delay detection of adverse events (AEs), according to a new analysis published in JAMA Internal Medicine . “These data highlight the importance of proactive identification of postmarketing device-related safety issues to provide health care professionals with more complete data regarding potenti...
  • Regulatory NewsRegulatory News

    Breast implant label guidance finalized by FDA

    Updated 29 September to add comment from CDRH official The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued final guidance on improving patient information regarding breast implants on 28 September. The final guidance largely echoes draft labeling guidance issued in October 2019, with some clarifications surrounding the relationship between implants and systemic disease, language to improve the readability of the patient device card, and information on specific registries...