Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Join the brightest minds in regulatory at the annual Regulatory Convergence. See the global regulatory community in action. Intensive workshops. Topical sessions. Meet ups with regulators. This is where it all comes together.
For 20 years, our flagship publication, Fundamentals of US Regulatory Affairs, has been giving regulatory professionals the insights and answers they need, right at their fingertips.
There are hundreds of RAC testing centers available worldwide. Any of the four RAC exams (US, EU, CAN or Global) may be taken at any location. Find an upcoming exam at a location near you.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 04 January 2012 | By
A long-standing and popular diagnostic test used by physicians to screen patients for cognitive ailments is being subjected to copyright claims that threaten to restrict the use of the test and others like it.
Writing in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), John C. Newman, PhD and Robin Feldman, JD describe the saga of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). First published in 1975, the 30-question test grew in to a ubiquitous presence thanks to lax copyright enforcement by its three creators.
Then, in 2000, an exclusive license was granted to Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR), who in turn began to enforce the copyright and charge for the test. In response, Tamara Fong developed a similar diagnostic test known as the "Sweet 16" that tested for the same conditions and used a similar line of questioning.
In March of 2011, PAR filed a copyright dispute with Fong, leading to the takedown of the Sweet 16 test.
The NEJM authors see this case as having a chilling effect on the development of further clinical tools.
"The MMSE case may be a harbinger of more to come. Many clinical tools we take for granted, such as the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, fall into the same "benign neglect" copyright category as the MMSE did before 2000. At any time, they might be pulled back behind a wall of active copyright enforcement by the authors or their heirs."
The authors propose the development of tools under the "copyleft" blueprint of open-source technology, "[encouraging] innovation and access while protecting author's rights" in order to preserve diagnostic tests for future generations.
Tags: Copyright, Test, Latest News, diagnostic
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.