Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at email@example.com if you need assistance.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 08 February 2012 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC
The 510(k) approval process used by North Carolina company TearScience could represent a new and imitable strategy for other companies to follow, said TearScience CEO Tim Willis in remarks to Med City News on 7 February.
The company's device, the LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System, is used to treat dry eye by clearing channels that supply the eye with moisture-retaining oils.
The company applied for 510(k) clearance in two separate filings, and received clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration just seven months after their initial filing.
"If you tried to do both of these filings (at once), especially in this regulatory environment, I doubt we'd get cleared by now," said Willis.
The FDA's 510(k) process is used by companies to prove "substantial equivalence" to existing medical devices in lieu of conducting time consuming and costly clinical trials to prove a device's safety and efficacy.
"In hopes of speeding things along, the company made an initial filing for the part of LipiFlow that treats the patient - the disposable piece that is used on the patient's eye," wrote MedCity News. "After that part received FDA clearance, the company filed its application for what the physician uses including upgraded software and a handheld unit. It's the full unit that TearScience will be marketing in the United States."
Tags: Filing, TearScience, Latest News, 510(k), approval
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.