Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Join the brightest minds in regulatory at the annual Regulatory Convergence. See the global regulatory community in action. Intensive workshops. Topical sessions. Meet ups with regulators. This is where it all comes together.
For 20 years, our flagship publication, Fundamentals of US Regulatory Affairs, has been giving regulatory professionals the insights and answers they need, right at their fingertips.
There are hundreds of RAC testing centers available worldwide. Any of the four RAC exams (US, EU, CAN or Global) may be taken at any location. Find an upcoming exam at a location near you.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 16 May 2012 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC
The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) draft guidance on biosimilars attracted general praise and some pointed criticism at a public meeting held 11 May as companies jockeyed for more flexibility and clarification, reports Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN).
The meeting drew a huge amount of testimony, presentations and general comments from a host of companies and organizations, including Abbott, Amgen, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, PAREXEL, BIO, Eli Lilly, Mylan, GPhA, Genentech, Teva and Hospira.
While some companies have been sharply criticizing the draft guidance for months - see Regulatory Focus's 26 April story "Biosimilars Guidelines Attract Attention, Criticism" - FDA's 11 May meeting saw a more measured response, writes GEN.
"Executives from a dozen biopharma companies, however, pressed for greater flexibility in the definition of proteins, tighter standards in naming and labeling follow-on biologics, as well as more details on moving drugs through agency approvals," said GEN.
Companies are also concerned about several other issues, including how to protect trade secrets, how much data will be required to approve a biosimilar product, whether pediatric trials will be necessary and how interchangeable the products will be once approved.
Read more:
GEN - FDA's Hearing for Biosimilars Showcased Issues Ranging From Definitions to Study Requirements to IP
Docket Folder Summary - Draft Guidances Relating to the Development of Biosimilar Products; Public Hearing; Request for Comments
Regulatory Focus - FDA Releases Long-Awaited Guidances on Biosimilar Price Competition and Innovation Act
Regulatory Focus - Biosimilars Guidelines Attract Attention, Criticism
Tags: Comments, Meeting, Latest News, Biogenerics, biosimilar, draft guidance, Biosimilars, Follow-on Biologics, Biologics
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.