Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Join the brightest minds in regulatory at the annual Regulatory Convergence. See the global regulatory community in action. Intensive workshops. Topical sessions. Meet ups with regulators. This is where it all comes together.
For 20 years, our flagship publication, Fundamentals of US Regulatory Affairs, has been giving regulatory professionals the insights and answers they need, right at their fingertips.
There are hundreds of RAC testing centers available worldwide. Any of the four RAC exams (US, EU, CAN or Global) may be taken at any location. Find an upcoming exam at a location near you.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 17 January 2013 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC,
India's primary drug regulatory body, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) is reaching out to all regional and state drug regulatory bodies under its supervision, reminding them that they cannot approve new drugs or new fixed dose combinations (FDCs) and giving sponsors of unapproved, marketed drugs 18 months to obtain approval from CDSCO.
In a letter dated 15 January 2013, Drugs Controller General of India G.N. Singh reiterated that by law, CDSCO must grant manufacturing licenses for new drugs and FDCs, or the combination of two or more already-approved drugs in a single dose.
The letter comes several months after a scathing report from the Indian Parliament that all but accuses the regulator of failing to do its job to approve new drug products and conduct thorough reviews.
Singh's letter references the report, adding that it found that "some of the State Licensing Authorities have issued manufacturing licenses for a very large number of FDCs without prior clearance from CDSCO."
"This has resulted in the availability of many FDCs in the market which have not been tested for efficacy and safety," Singh observed. "This can put patients at risk."
Singh's observations aren't new. The letter goes on to note that five years ago, regulators withdrew almost 300 FDCs from the market after finding that they had been approved without prior authorization from CDSCO. That withdrawal is still in the process of being litigated.
Regulators have also issued "repeated statutory directions under Section 33P" to state regulators informing them that they cannot grant licenses for new drugs or FDCs, apparently to little effect.
Still, the scope of the problem presents problems for CDSCO. Singh's letter announces that manufacturers will have 18 months to prove to CDSCO that their drugs are efficacious and safe. After that time, "Such FDCs will be considered for being prohibited for manufacture and marketing in the country," it adds. No further FDCs will be allowed to come onto the market without prior approval from CDSCO.
The "very large number" of unapproved drug products that may wish to be tested by CDSCO has the potential to overwhelm its staff, which the same parliamentary report explained is already over-burdened, under-funded and otherwise ill-equipped to meet its basic duties as a regulator.
Tags: Singh, DCGI, pharmaceutical, approval, drug
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.