Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
Keep the sparks coming! Delegates of the conference have access to on-demand content until the end of October 2021.
This brand-new publication offers a guide through the complex landscape of regulations, standards, and interpretations surrounding software as a medical device.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 23 October 2013
The European Parliament has agreed to new measures that would see an overhaul of the Medical Device Directive, but notably stopped short of requiring a premarket approval system-the likes of which is currently in place in the US-in favor of a slightly more relaxed system of regulation relative to what had originally been proposed by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) in September 2013.
EU legislators have been seeking to overhaul device regulations for nearly two years following a series of high-profile scandals and device failures, including deficient breast implants and faulty metal-on-metal hip implants. The failures were taken by some legislators to indicate that a more rigorous system of premarket review was needed, particularly for high-risk and implantable medical devices.
However, the plans generated by ENVI to respond to the perceived failures received sharp rebukes from industry, which claimed the additional measures would add billions in "unnecessary" costs and delay approval times by years.
New measures voted on by members of the EU Parliament on 22 October 2013 are significantly more lenient by contrast, removing some of the most burdensome requirements.
"The proposed legislation seeks to improve transparency of information for patients and medical staff and to strengthen traceability rules, without creating additional burdens for innovative small manufacturers," Parliament officials explained in a statement.
Among the text's numerous provisions are ones to "reinforce" public access to clinical trials data, the creation of an "implant card" system to allow patients to know which products are inside them, new CE marking requirements to permit only qualified experts to mark devices, new safety rules for IVDs that will require the approval of an ethics board, and new liabilities for device reprocessors.
The legislation now goes to the European Council, which will negotiate the implementation of both files in the "coming weeks" with member states, officials said. "Possible first-reading agreements would then be put to a vote in the Public Health committee before seeking final approval by the full House."
The Parliament's measures have already received a warm response from EU industry group Eucomed, which called it an improvement that is "paving the way to achieve balanced EU rules on medical devices."
"Industry holds the opinion that the Parliament has improved some very essential elements of the approval system, such as clarifying roles and responsibilities of authorities, the Medical Device Co-ordination Group (MDCG), and clinical experts; ensuring Member States authorities are managing the 'scrutiny' system, introducing the concept of utilising a small group from a pool of independent scientific experts to support the MDCG in their decision making and installing high-level expertise and quality amongst Notified Bodies.
"Eucomed believes that further improvements in the discussions with Council should look at building the scrutiny process into the upgraded notified body approval system and not adding it on top of or afterwards which would double or even triple the level of bureaucracy in an already improved system," it continued. " Eucomed now believes that Council and Parliament can concentrate on further improvements, in particular on the medical device approval system, re-processing of medical devices, appropriate clinical requirements and a sensible and scientific approach to hazardous substances."
Tags: EU, medical device
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.