Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
Keep the sparks coming! Delegates of the conference have access to on-demand content until the end of October 2021.
This brand new book offers practical guidance on navigating this exciting area of converging technologies.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 21 June 2013 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC,
After years of delays from various regulatory agencies, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced the release of a major new proposed regulation on performance standards for laser products.
FDA first proposed the rule in March 1999 before withdrawing it by November 1999. The rule was then resurrected in 2006 as part of FDA's unified agenda, a list of all documents it plans to publish in a given year.
The rule then languished further before being sent to the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs - an office that acts as a sort of regulator of regulators - on 24 May 2011. The rule remained at OIRA for an unusually lengthy amount of time, only reaching the public on 21 June 2013, more than two years after it was first submitted to OIRA and almost seven years after it was first proposed.
As explained by FDA, the proposal is meant to harmonize its laser requirements with those advanced by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The standard would apply to both normal laser products and medical laser products.
"The proposal would adopt portions of an IEC standard to achieve greater harmonization and reflect current science," FDA explained in an abstract for OIRA. "In addition, the proposal would include an alternative mechanism for providing certification and identification, address novelty laser products, and clarify the military exemption for laser products."
The problem, FDA explained in its Federal Register announcement on the regulation, is that at the time the last laser regulation was issued, many of the laser products that are now standard had yet to be invented. In the meantime, the IEC has continued to update its standards, and the scientific community's understanding of the risks associated with laser products has advanced as well.
The practical effects of the rule could be mixed. A July 2001 guidance document noted that FDA would exercise its discretion in allowing companies to meet either FDA's or IEC's standards for laser products. The guidance was revised in 2007 to reference updated standards.
However, for those companies that have not yet met IEC's updated standards, FDA's proposed rule would finally require them to meet two IEC standards (IEC 60825-1:2007 and IEC 60601-2-22:2007) that have been slightly modified where FDA feels that "FDA's standard is more precise than the IEC's."
"For example, FDA's current standard with respect to collateral radiation, human access, modification of laser products, and key control capability protect against other hazards not reflected in the IEC standards. These differences relate specifically to the criteria in the IEC standards for determining human access to low levels of laser radiation that are recognized to be ocular hazards only, and concern the emission limits for surveying and visual display laser products."
However, the amount of time between the last laser products standard update - by FDA's count, around a quarter century - has necessitated certain structural changes as well. Regulators said the proposed standard would adopt many of IEC's concepts while retaining the "traditional organizational structure of the FDA standard" to aid with industry compliance.
The proposed rule contains provisions that are directly applicable to medical products.
Section 1040.11(a), explained FDA, would update certain clauses and sub-clauses to address updated technology and use conditions for medical laser products. These provisions (sub-clause 201.7.9.2 and clause 201.10) are meant to minimize exposure to laser radiation during use.
The complete substance of that rule is as follows:
Medical device manufacturers will also need to adhere to the rest of the standard, which includes requirements about warnings to be affixed on laser products, notes that light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are specifically exempt from the regulation, explains how the regulation applies to component parts, defines "collateral radiation," and includes engineering specifications.
FDA said that the costs of harmonizing certain products may be substantial for some manufacturers. "[Some] laser manufacturers would incur one-time additional costs from increased harmonization," estimated to be between six and seven million dollars. The benefits of the rule, estimated at $13.4 million, would outweigh those benefits, FDA said.
The agency's estimated economic costs may run into at least one problem, however. As most of the impact studies were conducted in 2006 when the rule was first being prepared, the agency said it has had to use inflation adjustments to account for some of the new estimates. This could give the industry an opportunity to argue that certain estimates are out of date, further delaying the rule.
FDA - Laser Products Rule
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.