Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
Registration is now open for RAPS Euro Convergence 2021! Attend to join peers from EU and around the world to gain insights and exchange ideas on the regions most pressing issues.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 10 January 2014 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC,
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced the formation of an eagerly awaited advisory committee set to offer critical input in deciding which drug products will no longer be allowed to be compounded under the terms of a recent piece of legislation.
That legislation, the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), was passed into law on 27 November 2013, and contained numerous provisions intended to regulate pharmaceutical products produced by so-called "compounding pharmacies."
Unlike more traditional pharmaceutical manufacturers-think Pfizer, for example-compounding pharmacies make custom versions of already-approved pharmaceuticals with the stated purpose of meeting unique patient needs. A compounding pharmacy might make a smaller dose of a drug than is commercially available, for example.
But as a massive outbreak of fungal meningitis in late 2012 illustrated, not all was well in the compounding sector. FDA investigators would later determine that deficient quality practices at a compounding pharmacy had resulted in patients being exposed to contaminated products, and a subsequent surge of inspections found dozens of compounders with similar deficiencies.
Those findings in hand, legislators passed the DQSA, which creates a new system in which some compounding pharmacies will register with FDA and consent to inspections. The hope, legislators said, is that this category of pharmacy will be sought after by consumers because of the quality assurances they offer relative to smaller pharmacies.
But unlike their state-regulated counterparts, federally regulated "outsourcing pharmacies" will be subject to additional restrictions. Chief among those restrictions: not compounding any drug product present on a "difficult-to-compound" list. The theory is that certain drugs present unique challenges that make it difficult for companies to assure their potency, quality, consistency and bioavailability. Rather than risk patient safety, FDA will require those drugs to only be made by approved manufacturers.
So which drugs will be on that list? While the final determination will be up to FDA, it's due to receive help from an Advisory Committee created in 2012 and, as of 10 January 2014, seeking new members.
The Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) is now a standing committee intended to assist the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), FDA wrote in a Federal Register notice announcing its re-creation. The PCAC had previously been formed in 1998, but was disbanded in 2002 after part of FDA's compounding authority was found to be unconstitutional.
FDA says the committee will include 12 voting members, including a chair. Members will be selected from the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) and the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP), as well as representatives of patient and public health advocacy organizations. Members will serve four-year terms.
The committee will also include non-voting representatives from the pharmaceutical industry and a voting consumer representative, FDA said.
Once constituted, the committee will consider a list of drugs the public and industry wants to be on the list. Its final recommendations will then be sent to FDA for the agency's final consideration.
Responses are due to FDA by 13 February 2014.
Federal Register notice
Tags: Difficult-to-Compound, Pharmaceutical Compounding, Compounding Pharmacy, Compounding
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.