Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 26 February 2014 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC,
Months after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it would reverse its prior regulatory strategy on fecal microbiota transplants (FMT), the agency has released a new draft guidance document meant to further clarify its regulatory stance on the issue.
Fecal transplants are a relatively new innovation involving the transfer of either fecal matter or the bacteria found within fecal matter from a healthy patient to a sick one. Various published research has identified the procedure as being one that can fight off Clostridium difficile infections by introducing so-called "good bacteria" back into a person's body. The idea is to overload the gastrointestinal tract with enough of the good bacteria to overwhelm the C. diff, thereby ending the infection.
One device, known affectionately as either the "RoboGut" or the "RePoopulation Station," is essentially a small manufacturing facility that takes a selected 33 strains of healthy fecal microbiota which are then reproduced in a mixture for eventual transplantation during a colonoscopy procedure.
By standardizing the procedure, the researchers said they hoped to reduce the variability that now exists when FMTs are conducted and reduce the time between a patient having a need for the transplant and it occurring. At present, donors need to be found and screened, and patients aren't necessarily sure if they're getting the bacteria they need.
Uniform products would hypothetically allow for much higher assurances of quality, safety and efficacy - a problem FDA has been grappling with over the course of the last year.
At first, FDA said in May 2013 it would require the products to be administered under an approved Investigational New Drug Application, which is required for biological products seeking FDA approval. More practically, they're also an application used to begin or continue clinical testing in humans, and are meant to show that a product meets baseline levels of safety.
FDA said a lack of regulation was potentially resulting in patients receiving dangerous therapies.
However, FMT advocates fought back against FDA, saying the new rules were onerous and costly, and would result in more patients resorting to do-it-yourself fecal transplants outside medical facilities.
That pushback resulted in FDA reversing its decision in less than a month. In a June 2013 announcement, FDA said it would institute a compromise of sorts, one built on a familiar concept known as "regulatory enforcement discretion."
FDA would maintain that it has the authority to regulate FMT products, but would allow more practitioners to conduct FMT procedures without an approved IND.
"Some health care providers have stated that applying IND requirements will make FMT unavailable and have suggested that an alternative regulatory approach is needed to ensure the widespread availability of FMT for individuals with C. difficile infection unresponsive to standard therapies," FDA explained. "The agency acknowledges these concerns and intends to exercise enforcement discretion regarding the IND requirements for the use of FMT to treat C. difficile infection not responding to standard therapies provided the treating physician obtains adequate informed consent from the patient or his or her legally authorized representative for the use of FMT products."
At the time, FDA said the policy was meant as a stopgap measure while it "develops appropriate policies for the study and use of FMT products under an IND."
"FDA intends to exercise this discretion on an interim basis while we further consider the matter," it added in a Federal Register posting announcing a finalized guidance document in July 2013.
Now FDA is out with an additional draft guidance document, one elaborating on the further considerations it hinted at in July 2013.
The guidance, Enforcement Policy Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements for Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridium difficile Infection Not Responsive to Standard Therapies, again makes the case for an enforcement discretion based approach and states that further policies remain in the works.
The new guidance is meant to replace the July 2013 final guidance, FDA said, and reflect that FMT therapies will only be given leeway if they are intended for use in non-responsive cases of C. difficile.
FDA lays out a three-part approach in its guidance whereby it will not require an IND:
Failure to meet any of those standards will require the use of an IND, FDA said. In addition, FDA's policy does not apply to any other uses of FMT beyond C. difficile. Some doctors have floated the idea that the FMT approach may also be useful for patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBD).
The July 2013 guidance was the same in principle, but lacked a clear delineation between what was and what was not acceptable under the enforcement discretion policy. FDA is still working on evaluating its enforcement policy, it said.
Comments on the draft guidance are due to FDA by 28 March 2014.
The stopgap measure may be intended to hold the fledgling therapeutic area over until approved therapies reach the market, the first of which may arrive soon. In late June 2013, FDA granted "fast track" status to Rebiotix's FMT suspension RBX2660, meaning the product could see an approval decision in early 2014 barring any delays.
Guidance
Federal Register
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.