Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at email@example.com if you need assistance.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
The highly-anticipated fifth edition is here! Get the must-have resource for achieving compliance with medical device regulations.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
European regulatory officials have tightened the standards for obtaining approval for a drug name, reducing the number of proposed names companies can put forth for consideration at any one time.
The change, contained in a revised guideline, on the Acceptability of Names for Human Medicinal Products Processed Through the Centralised Procedure, reduces the number of proposed names that may be sent to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to two invented names.
At present, companies can submit as many as four names at each Name Review Group (NRG) meeting. In the future, companies will only be able to submit two at any one meeting. If both names are rejected, the company will need to propose up to two new names in a subsequent meeting of the NRG.
EMA said in a statement that the change will not be retroactive, giving companies until 1 January 2015—the implementation date for the guideline—to submit proposed names without penalty.
The NRG will also, in rare cases, be able to make exceptions for companies to submit more than two names, EMA said. Contributing factors might include:
In such cases, the marketing authorization holder will need to then indicate which two invented names should be maintained in the marketing authorization application, EMA wrote.
EMA also wrote that the MAHs should "clearly indicate at the time of submission whether the proposed (invented) names are intended to be used in the context of multiple marketing-authorisation applications. This is to allow the NRG to review whether the proposed (invented) names are not potentially confusing with each other."
Tags: Labeling, Invented Name, Proprietary Name, INN