Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
Registration is now open for RAPS Euro Convergence 2021! Attend to join peers from EU and around the world to gain insights and exchange ideas on the regions most pressing issues.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 07 July 2014 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC,
Since the passage of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) in 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been publicly meeting with patients who suffer from debilitating conditions without adequate treatment options in the hopes of better understanding their wants and needs in the drug development process.
Now the agency is gearing up for its ninth patient-focused drug development meeting, this time focusing on the views of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a debilitating and often deadly disease which progressively attacks a patient's lungs.
The patient-centered drug development program was the brainchild of disease advocate groups, which convinced legislators to include it in FDASIA. Under Section X of the act, FDA is instructed to assess its risk-benefit decision making as it relates to disease areas where treatment options are less than optimal. Patients may be willing to accept more risk if the alternative to treatment is worse, proponents of the section hypothesized, and FDA was ordered to facilitate a program that assesses that tolerance for risk on a disease-wide level, instead of doing so on a piecemeal basis for individual products.
"The human drug and biologic review process could benefit from a more systematic and expansive approach to obtaining input from patients who experience a particular disease or condition," FDA noted in its Federal Register posting announcing the program.
Practically, the program means FDA will start to assess the benefit-risk paradigms that each patient group is willing to accept in return for a treatment. A patient group suffering from an under-treated but otherwise medically benign condition might be less willing to accept high levels of risk in return for an effective treatment. Conversely, those suffering from a disease with few or even no recognized treatment options might be more willing than most to accept a drug that might either be less effective or more dangerous than FDA's benefit-risk paradigm ordinarily would permit.
The point, however, is for FDA to determine this framework in tandem with patients. The agency recently launched a Patient Network website aimed in part at educating patients about FDA's regulatory process so that they can better engage with regulators at these meetings and at other venues.
Previously, FDA has announced meetings around eight different disease areas: chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), HIV, lung cancer, narcolepsy, fibromyalgia, sickle cell disease (SCD), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and neurologic manifestations of inborn errors of metabolism.
The agency's ninth meeting, on IPF, reflects the severity of the disease, FDA said in a statement posted in the Federal Register.
"Many people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis survive only 3 to 5 years from the time of diagnosis," the agency explained. "There is no cure for IPF.”
As with other diseases under FDA's patient-focused drug development program, the agency has listed a number of questions it intends to ask of patients at its meeting.
But for the first time ever, all of the questions FDA says it will ask of IPF patients are substantially similar (or identical) to ones asked of patients affected by other diseases subject to prior patient-focused drug development meetings.
The list of questions is also notable for its brevity. FDA is asking IPF patients just eight questions—the second fewest thus far, and just half the number asked of HIV and sickle cell disease (SCD) patients.
The recent trend toward fewer questions asked at each meeting could be an aberration, but might also be the start of a trend in which FDA focuses more heavily on a core group of important questions for the purposes of its meeting.
That question will be put to the test over the next few years, as the agency has already announced it plans to hold eight more patient-focused drug development meetings focused on the following diseases:
FDA's IPF meeting will take place on 26 September 2014 at FDA's White Oak Campus in Silver Spring, MD. Registration for the meeting closes on 10 September 2014.
Federal Register notice.
Tags: Patient-Focused Drug Development, FDASIA, PFDD, Patients, Patient
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.