Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
Registration is now open for RAPS Euro Convergence 2021! Attend to join peers from EU and around the world to gain insights and exchange ideas on the regions most pressing issues.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
Posted 14 January 2015 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC,
Six of the world's most preeminent regulatory bodies have become increasingly adept at approving new drug products more quickly and consistently, according to a new analysis published by the Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS).
CIRS' analysis looked at new drug approval decisions made over the past decade by six regulators:
The data show a remarkable convergence among the median approval time among all six regulators since 2004, when the best regulator (FDA) was approving new drugs in 400 days on average, and Health Canada was taking more than 900 days on average.
Since 2004, every single regulatory body has exhibited an improvement in the time it takes to approve each medicine on average, though not all improvements have consistently trended downward.
FDA, for example, approves new drugs in about 300 days on average—25% faster than it did in 2004, but still not as fast as it approved drugs in 2005, when it approved them in about 250 days on average.
Read more about FDA's average new drug approval times in our report here.
Japan's PMDA and Health Canada may have had the most notable improvements over the past decade. In 2006, for example, PMDA approved drugs in more than 800 days on average. By 2013, it had the second best average approval times of any regulator. Health Canada made similar improvements, bringing down average approval times from 900 days in 2004 to around 350 days on average for the third best showing of the six regulators.
Australia's TGA averaged about 400 days per review, while EMA and Swissmedic both clocked in at around 500 days on average.
CIRS' data also shows that the consistency of drug reviews has improved markedly, with all regulators approving drugs within more predictable timeframes. For example, in 2004 FDA approved 50% of all drugs between 200 and 900 days. By 2013, it ranged between around 250 days and 350 days. Japan's PMDA saw even more remarkable improvements, approving 50% of all applications between 250-350 days in 2013 compared to 600 to 1,200 days in 2006.
CIRS data also indicates that expedited approval applications, such as FDA's accelerated approval pathway, do not appear to have caused the drop in approval times across all regions, though the three regulators with the slowest average approval times used expedited approval pathways the least.
CIRS Analysis
CIRS Blog Post
Tags: CIRS, New Drug Approvals, Average Approval Times, FDA Average Drug Approval, EMA Average Drug Approval
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.