Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
RAPS Euro Convergence brings regulatory peers from the EU and worldwide together in one forum to gain insights and exchange ideas on the region's most pressing issues. Register today to attend 10-12 May 2021.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
With contributions from more than 30 authors from seven countries, the new edition incorporates a global overview of the field and is designed to help you get the most out of your regulatory intelligence endeavors.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 13 November 2015 | By Zachary Brennan
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday again ordered a recall of all Custom Ultrasonics’ Endoscope Washer/Disinfector models, also known as Automated Endoscope Reprocessors (AERs), to mitigate the risk of patient infection.
FDA said its most recent inspection of the Custom Ultrasonics’ facility in April documented continued violations and that the company’s AERs “have been used in health care facilities that reported the transmission of serious bacterial infections.” The company has had issues with FDA since before it entered a consent decree with the agency in 2007.
“Violations include the inability to validate that the AERs can adequately wash and disinfect endoscopes to mitigate the risk of patient infection. The identified violations could result in an increased risk of infection transmission,” FDA said. “Under the terms of the consent decree, the agency is ordering Custom Ultrasonics to recall all its AERs.”
AERs are free-standing units used in health care facilities to disinfect flexible endoscopes and scope accessories between uses in gastrointestinal and pulmonary tracts.
FDA has previously warned about duodenoscopes, which also can be difficult to sanitize, and have been found to spread bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE).
In August, FDA sent a warning letter to Japan-based Olympus for failing to notify the agency of deaths or serious injuries that may have been caused by its duodenoscope. FDA pointed to 16 patients who contracted a Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, of which some resulted in abscesses, after undergoing an endoscopic procedure with the Olympus device.
FDA has also warned two other manufacturers -- Fujifilm and Hoya – for failures related to cleaning procedures and reporting known infections.
In 2012 and 2013, under the terms of the consent decree, FDA ordered Custom Ultrasonics to stop manufacturing and distributing all AER device models and components after the company failed to obtain FDA clearance following a significant change to the software operating system for one of its AERs.
After Custom Ultrasonics obtained clearance for the software change, the cleared devices were permitted to remain on the market. Since the 2012 and 2013 orders, the FDA has not authorized Custom Ultrasonics to resume manufacturing or distributing any AERs, though the company has continued to service them.
Since 10 August, FDA has received 21 complaints on Custom Ultrasonics. FDA recommends that health care facilities currently using Custom Ultrasonics AERs transition away from their use to alternative reprocessing methods as soon as possible.
In March, FDA also issued new guidance requiring manufacturers of reusable medical devices to more thoroughly test and label their devices to ensure patients are not inadvertently exposed to dangerous pathogens.
FDA Recommendation
Tags: endoscope, bacterial infection, duodenoscope, FDA recalls
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.