Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
RAPS Euro Convergence brings regulatory peers from the EU and worldwide together in one forum to gain insights and exchange ideas on the region's most pressing issues. Register today to attend 10-12 May 2021.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
With contributions from more than 30 authors from seven countries, the new edition incorporates a global overview of the field and is designed to help you get the most out of your regulatory intelligence endeavors.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 09 December 2015 | By Zachary Brennan
Leading gynecology experts sent an open letter to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Tuesday calling on the agency to rescind or revise a warning it issued that restricted use of a device in minimally invasive procedures to treat uterine fibroids.
The warning on laparoscopic power morcellators (LPM) followed FDA concerns that if a presumed benign fibroid is later found to be a malignancy called a leiomyosarcoma, fragments of the cancer will be scattered by a LPM, increasing the risk of spread. The agency issued new restrictions in November 2014, outlined in its guidance document, Product Labeling for Laparoscopic Power Morcellators, to "promote the safe and effective use of LPMs when used for gynecologic surgeries.”
But now, 48 gynecologists, gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologists, department chairs and women’s health advocates said in the letter that they believe the agency’s decision, although well-intentioned to protect against the spread of a rare form of uterine cancer, was based on incorrect data, and it could require tens of thousands of women with benign fibroids to undergo major abdominal surgery each year.
In addition to the letter, the Leiomyoma Morcellation Study Group published a related editorial Tuesday in Obstetrics & Gynecology, and another study from the same journal notes that there was “a significant decrease in the proportion of minimally invasive hysterectomies and myomectomies performed during the 8 months after the FDA warning statement on the use of power morcellation.”
William Parker, the editorial’s lead author and director of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery at UCLA, said: “We believe the FDA failed to identify important information, leading to inaccurate results. We hope the agency will take a second look so that women will continue to have effective, minimally invasive treatment options for fibroids.
“The FDA’s estimate that 1 in every 458 women having surgery for presumed fibroids actually has LMS appears to overstate the risk,” Parker added, noting that a recent analysis of 133 studies determined that the risk of finding a leiomyosarcoma among women having surgery for presumed fibroids was actually 1 in 1,960, or 0.051 percent.
He also told Reuters that FDA’s recommendations “were not based on science, but rather on emotional and anecdotal information.”
The group also offered six clinical recommendations for FDA:
– Greater caution should be exercised before recommending morcellation procedures for post-menopausal women. – Women 35 or older with irregular bleeding and presumed fibroids should have a biopsy of the lining of the uterus and normal Pap smear results. – Certain ultrasound or MRI findings should increase suspicion of leiomyosarcoma. – Women considering procedures involving morcellation for fibroids should be informed of the potential risk if leiomyosarcoma is found, and open surgery should be offered to all women considering minimally invasive procedures. – Following morcellation, doctors should carefully inspect for retained tissue fragments and irrigate the pelvic and abdominal cavities thoroughly. – Research projects should be initiated to find ways to noninvasively, preoperatively identify leiomyosarcoma and to discover how tissue fragments and cells are able to spread, implant and grow.
Hal Lawrence, executive vice president and CEO of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, also put out a statement saying that the commentary largely reflects the positions of the group.
Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy
U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Guidance Regarding Morcellation of Leiomyomas: Well-Intentioned, But Is It Harmful for Women?
ACOG Statement on FDA regulation of Morcellation
Tags: power morcellators, LPMs, FDA warnings, uterine fibroids, gynecology
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.