Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
Registration is now open for RAPS Euro Convergence 2021! Attend to join peers from EU and around the world to gain insights and exchange ideas on the regions most pressing issues.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 21 December 2015 | By Michael Mezher
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized guidance Monday that would end the agency's policy of indefinitely deferring gay and bisexual men, or men who have sex with men (MSM), from donating blood.
Since 1983, FDA has recommended an indefinite deferral for MSM in order to reduce the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
In recent years, FDA and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have been considering how to revise the policy in light of new scientific evidence. At the same time, FDA has faced public pressure to change its policies, with medical groups such as the American Medical Association (AMA), American Red Cross and the American Association of Blood Banks calling for the ban to be lifted.
In December 2014, FDA announced it would be ending its policy of a lifetime ban in favor of a 12-month deferral period. Then, in May 2015, FDA released its draft guidance, Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products.
At the time, critics argued that even a 12-month deferral period was unwarranted, as modern diagnostics can detect HIV in as little as 10 days.
Now, MSM are eligible to donate blood if they wait 12 months after having sex with another man.
The guidance also recommends for gender identity to be self-reported by donors, and removes a clause that appeared in the draft version that would have allowed medical directors to "exercise discretion" for donors that "asserted a change in gender identification."
In a press briefing today, Peter Marks, deputy director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), said the agency has "taken great care to ensure this policy revision is backed by sound science and continues to protect our blood supply."
In making the case for the 12-month deferral, Marks pointed to other countries with comparable HIV demographics, such as the UK and Australia, which currently use such a deferral period.
Marks said in a call with reporters the agency considered several options before deciding on a 12-month deferral, including eliminating the deferral altogether or relying on individual risk assessments to screen donors for HIV transmission risk. He added that eliminating the deferral altogether would be untenable, as HIV diagnostics "are not perfect" and HIV can go undetected in patients for a short time after infection.
Marks said countries such as South Africa and Italy, which use individual risk assessments, have higher rates of HIV in heterosexual populations and rely on trained physicians to conduct the risk assessment, making a comparison to the US difficult.
Marks also said FDA received more than 700 comments on the guidance from groups or individuals, with about half supporting either a time-based deferral or individual donor risk-assessments, and half still in support of an indefinite ban.
FDA Press Release, Q&A, Guidance
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.