Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 18 August 2015 | By Michael Mezher
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced it will pilot a new initiative to explore criteria for allowing medical device manufacturers to report malfunctions of certain low- and medium-risk devices on a quarterly basis.
In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) made changes to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C), requiring makers of certain class I and class II devices to report malfunctions on a quarterly basis, based on a set of criteria defined by FDA.
Specifically, the quarterly reporting requirement would apply to class I devices and class II devices "that are not permanently implantable, life supporting, or life sustaining." For class III devices and class II devices that do not meet the listed requirements, companies will still be required to submit individual malfunction reports within 30 days, as per Part 803 of Code of Federal Regulations.
Now, the agency says it is looking for companies to take part in a pilot program where device malfunction reports are submitted quarterly. The agency says the pilot will help it develop the criteria for quarterly malfunction reporting submissions in the future.
The agency says up to nine companies may take part in the pilot program, and it intends to run the pilot for six months.
Companies taking part in the pilot will be given an exemption from current malfunction reporting requirements through the duration of the pilot, though other reportable events must still be sent in the 30-day window.
FDA says the quarterly reports should be in a summary format using Form FDA 3500A. The reports will include a description of the event or problem, the number of events contained in the report, as well as device identifying information and contact information for the manufacturer. Additionally, the agency requests companies:
"Provide a summary of the results of your investigation of the reported malfunctions, including the type of any remedial action taken or an explanation of why remedial action was not taken, and any additional information that would be helpful to understand how you addressed the malfunction events summarized in the report. Also enter a breakdown of the malfunction events summarized in the report, including the number of devices that were returned to you; the number of devices that were labeled for single use (if any); and the number of devices that were reprocessed and re-used (if any)."
In the pilot announcement, FDA also gives two scenarios to demonstrate the format and contents of the reports, one involving an infusion pump and a second involving multiple malfunctions pertaining to a powered bed.
Federal Register
Tags: Malfunction reporting
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.