Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
The highly-anticipated fifth edition is here! Get the must-have resource for achieving compliance with medical device regulations.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Following two meetings with drug companies and other stakeholders in July and September, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) says it will publish the first clinical trial reports in mid-2016.
The release of the reports comes as EMA's policy on publishing the data came into effect last January. The new policy applies to clinical reports contained in all marketing-authorization applications submitted on or after 1 January 2015, and includes reports where drugmakers have notified EMA of the withdrawal of a marketing authorization application.
EMA held two meetings to offer more detailed discussions on two guidance documents under development -- one on the identification and redaction of commercially confidential information in the clinical reports and the other on the anonymization of clinical reports, in the context of the new policy.
"EMA emphasized that both guidance documents should be, once finalized, considered 'living' documents that will be updated in light of experience obtained," the agency said in a summary of the July meeting.
In the September meeting with patient associations, academia, representatives of National Competent Authorities and industry associations, EMA presented new technical guidance on the procedures tied to the submission of clinical reports, which included information on how trial materials should be sent to the agency, as well as information on the redaction consultation process and the overall process leading to publication.
The meeting centered on the "evolving nature of anonymization taking account of the objective of data utility and the legal requirements for personal data protection," EMA said.
"On one hand, if large sections of a clinical study report are removed, the risk of re-identification is likely to be very low but data utility will be compromised. On the other hand, if a clinical study report is ‘under’ redacted this could lead to the publication of documents that have a high risk of re-identification," the agency added.
The agency said it will meet in October and consult with the European ombudsman and the European data protection supervisor on further plans for the transparency policy.
In addition to the implementation of EMA's transparency policy, the European Commission, EMA and World Health Organization announced Tuesday that they agreed on 1 September to share more non-public inform
EMA September Stakeholder Meeting
Press Release on Trial Transparency
WHO, EC, EMA Sharing Press Release
Tags: EMA, trial transparency, WHO, European Commission, clinical trial data reports