Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
Registration is now open for RAPS Euro Convergence 2021! Attend to join peers from EU and around the world to gain insights and exchange ideas on the regions most pressing issues.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 27 January 2016 | By Michael Mezher
Prescriptions for hydrocodone combination products (HCPs) fell significantly after the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) tightened restrictions on those drugs, according to a study published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine.
For years the US has been in the grips of a prescription drug abuse epidemic, in part driven by the availability of hydrocodone and other opioids such as oxycodone, codeine and methadone. In 2013, more than 200 million prescriptions for opioids were filled in the US, 136 million of which were for hydrocodone.
The opioid epidemic is also seeing increased attention in Congress. Last week, Sen. Edward Mackey (D-MA) placed a hold on the vote to nominate Robert Califf as US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner, and today, six senators wrote to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urging the agency to release its long-delayed opioid prescribing guidelines.
When the Controlled Substances Act was enacted in 1971, drugs containing hydrocodone as the only active ingredient were listed on Schedule II, signifying a high potential for abuse, while HCPs were placed on the less restrictive Schedule III. Notably, prescriptions for Schedule II drugs cannot by refilled, unlike those for Schedule III drugs, which can be refilled for up to six months.
DEA first requested the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provide it with a recommendation for rescheduling HCPs in 2004. In its response in 2008, HHS responded that HCPs should remain Schedule III drugs.
Under the 2012 Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was instructed to hold a public meeting to gather input to inform its recommendation to DEA on scheduling HCPs.
In 2013, FDA convened its Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee (DSaRM) to discuss whether HCPs should be rescheduled. After two days of deliberation, the panel recommended HCPs be rescheduled in a 19-10 vote.
Then, on October 6 2014, following a notice of proposed rulemaking, which drew 573 comments, DEA rescheduled HCPs from Schedule III to Schedule II.
To determine the effect rescheduling had on the number of prescriptions for HCPs, officials from HHS and FDA compared the number of prescriptions filled in the 36 months prior to the rescheduling to the 12 months after.
Prescriptions for liquid and tablet forms of HCPs declined 8.4% and 6.0%, respectively, over the 36 months prior to rescheduling.
However, after moving to Schedule II, prescriptions for liquid and tablet forms of HCPs dropped by 22% and 16%, respectively. According to the authors, 73.7% was due to the elimination of refills on these drugs.
The researchers also saw a slight increase in other opioid combination products corresponding with DEA's action, though this was not enough to "substantially offset" the drop in HCP prescriptions.
JAMA Internal Medicine
Tags: Hydrocodone, Opioid epidemic, Schedule II, DEA, Drug Enforcement Agency
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.