JAMA Ophthalmology." />
Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
Registration is now open for RAPS Euro Convergence 2021! Attend to join peers from EU and around the world to gain insights and exchange ideas on the regions most pressing issues.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 11 February 2016 | By Michael Mezher
Officials from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) say their efforts to develop a "regulatory toolkit" for sponsors has helped promote medical device innovation in the US, according to a recent viewpoint in JAMA Ophthalmology.
While fostering innovation has been one of CDRH's strategic priorities since 2010, reports that growth in device clinical trials in the US had fallen behind other countries, including Brazil, China, France, Germany and India, prompted the center to focus its efforts on improving the environment for domestic trials.
Out of concern that slowing growth in clinical trials could ultimately lead to a decline in innovative devices in the US, CDRH set goals for two critical areas for device clinical trials: improving the speed in approving investigational device exemptions (IDEs) and the number of early feasibility/first-in-human studies (EFSs).
Through its efforts, CDRH was able to reduce the time it took to review IDEs from a median 442 days in FY 2011 to just 30 days in FY 2015. Deborah Kotz, an FDA spokesperson, told Focus that CDRH also approved or conditionally approved 165 IDEs in 2015, the most in a single year since 2002.
According to the authors, the agency was able to meet these goals in part due to finalizing its guidance for EFSs, giving sponsors more clarity on the amount of data required to support EFS approval.
"The FDA acknowledges that completion of all nonclinical testing prior to initiation of an EFS may not be necessary when relevant nonclinical testing methods are not available or are not adequate," the authors write.
Additionally, the guidance includes a table for device evaluation strategy (DES) to help sponsors determine what information they need to support an EFS with limited nonclinical testing.
The authors also credit FDA's presubmission program with encouraging "direct collaborations" between manufacturers and the agency, and allowing for "distinct opportunities … to obtain feedback."
Internally, CDRH has established division-level teams to help sponsors prepare future EFS applications.
Within CDRH's Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices (DOED), a dedicated email address has been established to provide sponsors with direct access to the division's EFS team, who "are committed to responding to all inquiries within 2 business days."
Kotz also told Focus that CDRH plans "to establish mailboxes like this for each [CDRH] division in the near future."
The US Food and Drug Administration's New Regulatory Toolkit to Bring Medical Device Innovation Back to the United States
Tags: Investigational device exemption, IDE, Early feasibility study, EFS
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.