Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Resources, news and special offers to support you and your professional development during this difficult time.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Download your copy of the new events calendar and see all the online workshops, conferences, RAC exams and European online workshops RAPS has planned for 2021 at a glance.
Registration is now open for RAPS Euro Convergence 2021! Attend to join peers from EU and around the world to gain insights and exchange ideas on the regions most pressing issues.
An invaluable resource for any professional engaged in designing, composing, compiling, or commenting on regulatory documentation
From self-assessments to help you identify your strengths and areas to focus on to reference books and online courses that will help you fill in the gaps in your regulatory knowledge, RAPS has the resources to help you prepare for the RAC exam.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
Posted 12 April 2016 | By Zachary Brennan
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first time in its history allowed a manufacturer to switch from the more antiquated batch manufacturing process to a continuous manufacturing process – a move that FDA is seeking to encourage among more pharmaceutical manufacturers.
The manufacturing change, announced last Friday, is for Janssen’s HIV-1 treatment Prezista (darunavir). And although Janssen isn’t the first manufacturer to use continuous manufacturing (Vertex’s cystic fibrosis drug Orkambi [lumacaftor/ivacaftor] has been using the continuous manufacturing process since its approval in July 2015), FDA is keen on pushing more manufacturers to this newer, more efficient process that can enable faster production and more reliable products.
FDA says that Janssen’s efforts in manufacturing advancement were facilitated by the use of FDA’s draft guidance from December, Advancement of Emerging Technology Applications to Modernize the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Base, which was developed by the agency’s Emerging Technology Team and designed to help manufacturers implement a variety of technological advancements.
“Although it is not easy for drug manufacturers to transition from batch to continuous manufacturing, there are significant rewards. FDA encourages others in the pharmaceutical industry to consider similar efforts,” Lawrence Yu, Ph.D., FDA’s deputy director of the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), wrote in a blog post on Tuesday.
Like Dr. Yu, CDER Director Janet Woodcock has been advocating for continuous manufacturing since at least 2013 and told senators in January that she’s interested in seeing more manufacturers make the switch to continuous.
But others in industry are hesitant to predict that the pharmaceutical industry will make a rapid switch to continuous manufacturing, particularly as the technology has been around for decades and the industry has been slow to adapt.
Girish Malhotra, president of the pharma manufacturing consulting company Epcot International, who’s been writing about and discussing the switch to continuous manufacturing since 2005, told Focus that such a switch should have happened decades ago but it can be difficult for companies to make the switch while their product is still patented and large volumes of the drug are not needed.
“Under the current business model, it’s not feasible for brand drugs under patent unless you have a huge volume. It doesn’t make any sense,” Malhotra said.
But he also said generic drug manufacturers are prime candidates to switch to continuous manufacturing, particularly if the drugs they’re producing are high volume and they want to improve yields, lower costs and increase production capacity.
FDA blog post
Tags: continuous manufacturing, Janssen, Prezista, Vertex, batch manufacturing
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.