Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
Keep the sparks coming! Delegates of the conference have access to on-demand content until the end of October 2021.
This updated edition is a great reference for anyone working in multinational product development and marketing.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 06 January 2017 | By Michael Mezher
The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Biologics Research and Evaluation (CBER) has once again met or exceeded its performance goals for reviewing and acting on product applications and supplements, according to a report released Thursday from CBER Director Peter Marks.
The report is Marks' first since he rose to head CBER last January, replacing former CBER Director Karen Midthun after her 22-year stint at the agency.
As in previous years, CBER met or exceeded the performance goals for product reviews established by the various User Fee Acts:
Compared with 2015, CBER saw fewer Biologic License Applications (BLAs) with eight BLAs falling within the FY2016 review timeframe as opposed to 13 in FY2015.
Aside from hitting its performance targets for reviews, CBER published a total of 12 guidance documents in FY2016, four of which were published in cooperation with the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) or the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).
The guidances include four final guidances and six draft guidances, as well as two guidances for immediate implementation intended to reduce the risk of Zika virus transmission.
FY2016 Report from the Director
Tags: CBER, PDUFA, MDUFA, BLA
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.