Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
RAPS Euro Convergence brings regulatory peers from the EU and worldwide together in one forum to gain insights and exchange ideas on the region's most pressing issues. Register today to attend 10-12 May 2021.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
With contributions from more than 30 authors from seven countries, the new edition incorporates a global overview of the field and is designed to help you get the most out of your regulatory intelligence endeavors.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
The RAPS store will be under maintenance Saturday, 17 April between 5 AM and 12 PM EST. Store functionality may be unavailable at times during this window. We apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
Posted 02 February 2017 | By Nick Paul Taylor
Welcome to our European Regulatory Roundup, our weekly overview of the top EU regulatory news.
Secretary of State for Exiting the EU David Davis has raised doubts about the likely relationship between the UK and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) after Brexit. Asked about the health secretary’s comments that Brexit would likely result in Britain leaving EMA, Davis said his colleague was “misreported and misinterpreted.”
Speaking to fellow politicians last week, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt’s said, “I don't expect to remain within the European Medicines Agency.” Hunt made this point multiple times during the debate, citing Prime Minister Theresa May’s desire to leave the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice to explain why a close but separate relationship is the most likely outcome.
Davis was asked about Hunt’s comments during a session in the House of Commons to discuss exiting the EU. Luciana Berger, a politician in the opposition Labour Party, asked Davis “why his Government have so readily given up our membership of this vital body?” and what measures he will introduce to ensure Britain gains access to new medicines at the same time as the EU. Davis dismissed the question on the grounds it misrepresented Hunt’s position.
“The complete premise of the question is wrong,” Davis said. “That is not what the Health Secretary said; he was misreported and misinterpreted.” Davis went on to say he will put the “clinical safety of the British people at the front of the priority list” and also seek to look after the interests of the UK life sciences sector, but added no details to how Hunt was “misreported and misinterpreted” or what it means for the likely relationship with EMA.
Regulatory Focus contacted the Department for Exiting the European Union (DExEU) for clarification on how Hunt’s words were misreported and whether the government expects to leave EMA.
In response, a DExEU spokesperson said: “As the Health Secretary has said, the Government has not ruled out retaining the European Medicines Agency, nor did he rule out that we would continue to be a beneficiary and contributor to the EMA licensing regime. All future decisions are subject to the negotiations and we will be seeking the best deal for Britain, for our life sciences companies and for our NHS.”
The UK politicians in charge of Brexit have a history of contradicting each other, with Boris Johnson and Davis himself having both been publicly overruled by May after speaking up about how they see aspects of the exit progressing.
In a separate exchange, Davis discussed how Britain will seek to avoid disruption when exiting the EU by enshrining region-wide regulations into its national law. “The Great Repeal Bill will convert EU law as it applies, including EU regulations, into domestic law on exit. If needs be, we can reform the regulations after that,” Davis said. One concern raised in the run up to the referendum was that Brexit would leave the UK subject to EU regulations but with no power to influence them.
Debate Transcript, More
The Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) of Ireland has updated its advice on switching drugs from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) status. HPRA has used the update to encourage marketing authorization holders (MAHs) to contact it with switching proposals, and provided new details of how to retain prescription-only status while adding an OTC version of a product.
While most of the text is unchanged from the version HPRA introduced in 2010, the regulator has made two substantial amendments to the original text. The guide covers products approved nationally by HPRA, or through the mutual-recognition or decentralized procedures. Products approved centrally by EMA are outside the scope of the guide.
The first significant change relates to the process for applying to reclassify the legal status of a product from prescription-only to pharmacy-only, or from pharmacy-only to general sale. Since HPRA released the original guide, it has adopted a “proactive approach” to switching the status of “products containing specified active ingredients in the interest of public health.” HPRA has added details of this approach to the guide, and called for MAHs to email it with expressions of interest in switching the legal status of their products.
Officials have also added details of what happens after an expression of interest is submitted. HPRA will work with applicants to establish a timeframe for filing the switching application and supporting documents. The agency is encouraging MAHs to contact it as early as possible in the process.
The other substantial change to the text relates to companies that want to retain one legal status while adding another. HPRA thinks dual status could be useful when a product serves multiple indications or populations. Companies in this situation can make an “informed consent” application. In this instance, the product leaflet for the application should be the same as that for the authorized drug. The non-prescription product must have a new name.
HPRA Guide
The Netherlands’ Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) has started recruiting for a replacement for Bert Leufkens, who is set to step down as chairman in August after 10 years in the role. MEB is looking to replace Leufkens with a doctor, pharmacist or pharmacologist.
Applicants for the position are also expected to have a thorough knowledge of drug development, pharmacotherapy and related regulations, plus managerial and administrative experience. MEB expects the chairman to apply their experience and knowledge to untangle complex issues and represent the agency.
Leufkens, a pharmacist and epidemiologist, announced his intention to step down as chairman late last year. By the time Leufkens leaves MEB in August to focus on his academic work at Utrecht University, he will have spent exactly 10 years in charge of the agency.
MEB Statement, Job Posting (both Dutch)
The State Medicines Control Agency (SMCA) of Lithuania has warned of disruption to the supply of Roche’s Tamiflu. SMCA attributed the short-term shortage to a flu epidemic and subsequent rise in demand for the antiviral.
Faced with this situation, SMCA has cleared 75mg hard capsule formulations of Tamiflu with English language packs and leaflets for sale. The move is intended to ensure Tamiflu remains on the market while the country is waiting for supplies of local language packs to meet demand.
SMCA blamed a flu epidemic for the shortage. Data from Lithuania’s Centre for Communicable Diseases and AIDS (ULAC) show one-third of the country’s 60 municipalities is now experiencing a flu epidemic. In one municipality, the incidence rate is 247 per 10,000 inhabitants. That region is one of three where the incidence rate has risen to above 200 per 10,000 inhabitants.
Three people have died from influenza in the current flu season.
SMCA Notice, ULAC Data (both Lithuanian)
Tags: Brexit, Jeremy Hunt, David Davis, Guido Rasi
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.