Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
RAPS Euro Convergence brings regulatory peers from the EU and worldwide together in one forum to gain insights and exchange ideas on the region's most pressing issues. Register today to attend 10-12 May 2021.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
With contributions from more than 30 authors from seven countries, the new edition incorporates a global overview of the field and is designed to help you get the most out of your regulatory intelligence endeavors.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 09 March 2017 | By Zachary Brennan
Three EU biopharmaceutical industry groups are offering key considerations to physicians when switching from a biologic reference product to its biosimilar or from one biosimilar of a reference product to another, according to a new position paper released on Thursday.
While noting a lack of regulatory requirements for individually approved biosimilars to the same reference product to be compared with each other, the trio note: “Switching between biosimilars represents an unknown, and one that harbours considerable uncertainty.”
Dr. Duncan Emerton, a UK-based biosimilars expert, explained to Focus that although there is not a regulatory requirement to compare two or more biosimilars to one another, “When EMA [the European Medicines Agency] approves multiple biosimilars to the same reference product, they do using the same standard…One would expect both biosimilars to deliver the same clinical outcome.”
And because each new batch of a biologic is a different product, switching a patient between biosimilars for the same reference product is “no more risky” than switching a patient from the reference product to one of the biosimilars, Emerton noted.
The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations and European Biopharmaceutical Enterprises also note in the paper the “complex nature of biological molecules, which are often used to treat patients who have multifaceted, chronic diseases,” meaning any decision to switch to a biosimilar or to a reference product “should be made on a case-by-case basis and must be patient-, disease- and product-specific.”
The three industry groups, whose member companies stand to lose billions in brand name product revenues when more biosimilars are approved, also point to two scenarios when switching from a reference product to a biosimilar or vice versa is not recommended:
Position Paper
Tags: biosimilars, biosimilar switching, regulatory requirements biosimilars
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.