Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at raps@raps.org if you need assistance.
The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.
Share your knowledge and expertise with your regulatory peers by submitting an in-depth, evidence-based article focusing on key areas and emerging issues in the global regulatory landscape.
One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.
RAPS Euro Convergence brings regulatory peers from the EU and worldwide together in one forum to gain insights and exchange ideas on the region's most pressing issues. Register today to attend 10-12 May 2021.
Registration is now open for RAPS Convergence 2021! Gather with the regulatory community 12-15 September for four days of learning, engagement, and excitement.
With contributions from more than 30 authors from seven countries, the new edition incorporates a global overview of the field and is designed to help you get the most out of your regulatory intelligence endeavors.
Regipedia is an interactive resource created to benefit RAPS members with 24/7 access to more than 2,300 regulatory terms.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
Posted 11 September 2017 | By Michael Mezher
Speaking at RAPS' 2017 Convergence on Monday, officials from two international regulators and representatives from auditing organizations offered the latest on the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP).
MDSAP is an effort by regulators in the Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan and the US to establish a single audit process, conducted by recognized third-party auditors, that can meet the requirements of regulators in each country. For manufacturers, MDSAP offers an opportunity for fewer audits and less disruption.
In June, MDSAP released its final report detailing the program's experience through its pilot phase and into Q2 2017. While the pilot failed to attract as much interest as initially hoped during the pilot phase, the number of participating manufacturers doubled from 157 at the end of 2016 to 326 by the second half of 2017.
Since completing its pilot phase, four auditing organizations have become fully recognized to conduct MDSAP audits: BSI Group, TÜV SÜD America, Intertek Testing Services and Underwriters Laboratories.
Nine more auditors have been cleared to conduct three "witnessed" audits that are required to support full recognition and are in various stages of completing those audits. And one auditor, NSF, has applied to participate.
But despite the increase in the number of auditors working to participate in the program, the way regulators use the results of MDSAP audits vary.
For instance, in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) will accept a MDSAP certificate as proof of compliance with ISO 13485 when a TGA certificate of conformity (CAC) is not required. When a TGA CAC is required, TGA will still take MDSAP certificates into consideration and a MDSAP certificate may help a manufacturer avoid a routine inspection by TGA.
In Japan, Brazil and the US, MDSAP audit reports can be used as a substitute for routine inspections in certain circumstances.
Of all the participating agencies, Health Canada is the only regulator that is requiring companies to undergo MDSAP audits.
Beginning 1 January 2019, companies marketing Class II, III and IV devices in Canada will need a valid MDSAP certificate to get, maintain or amend a medical device license. Companies that have not transitioned from their Canadian Medical Device Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS) certificates to MDSAP ones will face having their device licenses suspended.
According to Nancy Shadeed, special advisor to Health Canada's International Programs Division, the agency is still intent on sticking to the 2019 deadline, despite some concerns from industry that the deadline may be difficult to meet.
And according to Patricia Murphy, global head of MDSAP programs at BSI, companies marketing devices in Canada will need to ramp up their participation to meet the 2019 deadline.
"We have seen three times the number of requests from 2016 into 2017, and knowing how many CMDCAS certificates are still out there, even that three times increase is not going to get us to where we need to," Murphy said.
Tags: MDSAP, Medical Device Single Audit Program
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.