Welcome to our new website! If this is the first time you are logging in on the new site, you will need to reset your password. Please contact us at email@example.com if you need assistance.
Your membership opens the door to free learning resources on demand. Check out the Member Knowledge Center for free webcasts, publications and online courses.
Hear from leaders around the globe as they share insights about their experiences and lessons learned throughout their certification journey.
The main RAPS website will offline for several minutes at 5 PM on 22 October 2021 due to scheduled maintenance.
We apologize for any inconvenience during this time.
Posted 23 January 2015 | By Alexander Gaffney, RAC,
Last year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received—and approved—substantially more requests for "compassionate" access to potentially life-saving treatments than any time since at least 2010, according to new data provided by the regulator.
The data relate to FDA's "expanded access" program—sometimes called its "compassionate use" program—which was created to allow a pathway for terminally or critically ill patients to obtain access to drugs they would otherwise not be eligible to receive.
Only patients with serious or immediately life-threatening diseases with no comparable or satisfactory therapeutic alternatives are eligible to receive a product through FDA's expanded access program. Even then, the company that produces the drug they wish to access must agree to provide the drug to the patient and obtain FDA approval under one of several types of clinical trial applications, known as investigational new drug applications (INDs).
Expanded access works, in general, in one of two ways: Either a company with an experimental product creates a new clinical trial for a patient through the use of an IND, or it amends an existing clinical trial to add new types of participants through the use of a "protocol amendment."
Once a company determines which approach it wants to take, it then needs to decide on how many patients it is willing to accommodate. There are four general types of expanded access INDs and protocols:
Those four types are found within both INDs and protocols, resulting in the following matrix:
More information can be found at 21 CFR 312 Subpart I.
While FDA cannot compel a company to give a patient an experimental drug, it is required to sign off on all requests to obtain experimental treatments through a clinical trial to ensure the patient understands the probable risks of the trial, and that the trial is more likely to help than harm the patient.
For a thorough explanation of FDA's expanded access/compassionate use programs, please see our comprehensive explainer article here.
In fiscal year 2014, FDA approved far more of those requests than the year prior, or any year since the agency began publishing statistics on expanded access request approvals in 2010.
A complete breakdown of FDA's approvals is as follows:
FDA's data show the overwhelming increase in its applications came from single patients seeking access through Single Patient Emergency INDs, which increased from 313 in 2013 to 1,066 in 2014—more than a 300% increase, and more than twice the previous record in 2010. Both Single Patient INDs and Intermediate Size INDs also saw large proportionate increases as well.
Rejections Remain Low
FDA's data also show the agency to reject relatively few expanded access applications each year.
The agency has not denied an expanded access protocol since it began keeping records in 2010.
FDA's new data comes just as many states are trying to make it easier for patients to obtain compassionate use access to drugs. Five states have since enacted "right to try" provisions, and more than a dozen others have introduced similar pieces of legislation.
Tags: Compassionate Use, Expanded Access, IND, Investigational New Drug Application
Regulatory Focus newsletters
All the biggest regulatory news and happenings.