FDA revises guidance on electronic systems and signatures in clinical trials
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Wednesday revised its draft guidance on electronic systems, records and signatures in clinical trials. While the new guidance continues to use the questions and answers format of the previous version, the topics addressed have been updated to account for technological advances.
“In addition, electronic systems and technologies are used and managed in novel ways, services are shared or contracted between organizations, and the electronic data flow between systems is more efficient and more prevalent,” FDA said. “The capabilities of electronic systems have improved, and features such as automated date and time stamps, audit trails, and the ability to generate complete and accurate copies and to archive records are standard components of many electronic systems.”
“Understanding the evolving uses of electronic records, electronic systems, and electronic signatures in clinical investigations is important for FDA in its assessment of the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of data submitted in support of marketing applications or submissions,” the agency added.
FDA said the new guidance updates recommendations for applying and implementing data integrity and data security controls, including the use of audit trails and the protection of records in the current environment of electronic systems used in clinical investigations. It also provides additional recommendations on the risk-based approach sponsors can take to validate electronic systems.
The updated guidance divides the Q&A topics by topics such as electronic records, electronic systems and electronic signatures. The guidance notably adds two new broad concepts including information technology (IT) and digital health technology (DHT).
In the previous draft guidance, the agency discussed mobile technology, outsourced electronic services, and telecommunication systems, which have been absorbed into other parts of the new guidance.
FDA said it is the responsibility of the sponsors and other regulated entities to ensure that the electronic records they submit through the IT vendors they use conform to the agency’s regulatory requirements. They need to consider, among other factors, the IT provider’s policies that may affect their clinical oversight abilities, processes and procedures that allow the user to validate the data and their ability to generate accurate and complete copies of records.
The guidance clarifies that DHT systems are defined by FDA as those that use computing platforms, connectivity, software and sensors for health care and related uses. They may be software- or hardware-based and may often run on general-purpose computing platforms such as mobile phones, tablets and smart watches.
FDA also points sponsors and other stakeholders to its 2021 draft guidance entitled Digital Health Technologies for Remote Data Acquisition in Clinical Investigations, which provides recommendations on DHT used for remote data acquisition from participants in clinical investigations evaluating medical products. When finalized, the agency said stakeholders can use that document to better understand DHTs that conform to its regulatory requirements.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued final guidance on 13 August regarding the types and timelines for formal meetings that sponsors can request during the development of new drugs and biological products.
Welcome to another installment of This Week at FDA, your weekly source for updates – big and small – on FDA, drug, and medical device regulation, and what we’re reading from around the web.
Industry and other stakeholders want the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide more clarity and ensure flexibility in a revised guidance on how drug and medical device makers should communicate with payors and other stakeholders about their products.