Got a gripe with an older draft guidance document? Now might be the time to air that grievance, with the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) announcing that it plans to conduct a retrospective analysis of all guidance documents issued prior to 2010 with the intent of withdrawing unnecessary documents or revising any documents in need of changes.
Writing in the 7 August 2013 edition of the Federal Register, FDA notes that CDER is embarking on a new initiative, one prompted by its September 2000 issuance of its Good Guidance Practices (GGP) regulation.
Explained FDA: "The GGP regulation describes FDA policies and procedures for the development, issuance, and use of guidance documents and makes these Agency policies and procedures clear to the public. The GGP regulation provides for developing and issuing guidances that set forth initial interpretations of statutory or regulatory requirements, explain changes in interpretation of policies that are of other than minor in nature, or discuss complex scientific issues or highly controversial issues."
And, important for the purposes of its upcoming activities, the GGP regulation also directs FDA to "periodically review" its existing stockpile of guidance documents to determine whether they need minor changes, major changes, or to be withdrawn entirely due to either irrelevance or other factors.
As part of those minor and major changes, FDA said it wants to finalize some of the many draft guidance documents it has issued. These documents are often published with the intent of obtaining industry and public feedback, but the agency conceded that it does not always have time to finalize the documents "because of higher staff priorities."
While the documents are not referenced quite as often as final guidance documents, FDA has nevertheless referenced them in its Warning Letters to companies. For example, a May 2012 letter to a pharmaceutical company critiques the design and layout of the facility, and calls on the company to reference the best practices established in a draft guidance document, since finalized.
In other words, because a guidance document only clarifies the agency's thinking (as opposed to a regulation, which is official policy as directed by statute), a draft guidance document can carry the same weight as a final draft guidance document.
The Federal Register notice indicates that FDA has already identified 23 draft guidance documents in need of withdrawal. "In most cases, FDA has developed other guidances and resources to assist industry with clinical evaluation and requirements for drug approval," the agency writes.
Those documents are:
In addition, FDA said it had identified a large number of guidance documents for revision and finalization, and is in the midst of "developing a plan for their completion." Those documents are related to the following topics:
Comments on the initiative may be submitted to FDA at any time.
FDA: Retrospective Review of Draft Guidance Documents Issued Before 2010; Withdrawal of Guidances
We have completed our migration to a new platform and are pleased to introduce the updated site.
What to expect: If you have an existing login, please RESET YOUR PASSWORD before signing in. After you log in for the first time, you will be prompted to confirm your profile preferences, which will be used to personalize content.
We encourage you to explore the new website and visit your updated My RAPS page. If you need assistance, please review our FAQ page.
We welcome your feedback. Please let us know how we can continue to improve your experience.