FDA finalizes guidance on suspect products under DSCSA
The US Food and Administrations (FDA) on Thursday finalized guidance defining what constitutes suspect and illegitimate products, as well as what constitutes products that are counterfeit, diverted, stolen, fraudulent or unfit for distribution.
The guideline aims to help industry meet their verification obligations under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) which requires trading partners to be able to identify a suspect or illegitimate product. The guidance sets out the agency’s interpretation of the terms “counterfeit,” “diverted,” “stolen,” “fraudulent transaction” and “unfit for distribution,” which are not defined by DSCSA.
Among the changes from the draft guidance is a clarification that the definition of diverted can include other scenarios besides products being dispensed to a patient. The former version defined diverted to “include product that is dispensed to a consumer or patient and then reintroduced into the U.S. pharmaceutical distribution supply chain to a trading partner.” The final guidance adds language stating that there could be other situations involving diversion of products that are “otherwise removed from the U.S. pharmaceutical distribution supply chain.”
The guidance also clarifies FDA’s expectations for handling unaccounted for products that are not deemed stolen. The revision adds new text stating that trading partners “may encounter a situation involving lost or missing product.” FDA said in these situations, companies should consult their own internal policies “to look into the circumstances surrounding the lost or missing product to determine whether it has been stolen or is otherwise suspect or illegitimate product.”
Additionally, the guidance expands the definition of ‘‘fraudulent transaction’’ to address clerical errors or discrepancies in product tracing information. The guidance states that “it may not be immediately evident whether product tracing information is knowingly falsified. There may be situations where there is a clerical error or discrepancy in the product tracing information that may not be indicative of a suspect product. In such circumstances, FDA recommends that a trading partner take steps to determine whether the error can be resolved and whether the product is suspect or illegitimate.”
Editorial changes were also made to improve clarity.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued final guidance on 13 August regarding the types and timelines for formal meetings that sponsors can request during the development of new drugs and biological products.
Welcome to another installment of This Week at FDA, your weekly source for updates – big and small – on FDA, drug, and medical device regulation, and what we’re reading from around the web.
Industry and other stakeholders want the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide more clarity and ensure flexibility in a revised guidance on how drug and medical device makers should communicate with payors and other stakeholders about their products.