rf-fullcolor.png

 

April 30, 2018
by Zachary Brennan

USP Will Not Move Forward With Proposal on Biologics Naming

USP announced Friday that it will not move forward with a proposal published in the Pharmacopeial Forum on biologics naming, and that it is postponing the implementation date (scheduled for 1 May) of the monograph for epoetin, a biologic commonly used to treat anemia.

The shift by USP follows pushback from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and questions raised by Amgen.

“Acknowledging the critical role public standards play in ensuring the quality of all drugs, including biologics, and facilitating access to them, USP will continue its focus on developing ‘performance standards, which are applicable to classes of biologics (e.g. monoclonal antibodies or cell therapies), as well as standards for raw materials,” USP said.

USP also said it intends to use the descriptive term “with sensor” in approved product names – for drug therapies with sensor technology that verifies when a patient has taken a medication. USP said it did not receive comments on this amendment, but FDA previously expressed its support for it.
×

Welcome to the new RAPS Digital Experience

We have completed our migration to a new platform and are pleased to introduce the updated site.

What to expect: If you have an existing login, please RESET YOUR PASSWORD before signing in. After you log in for the first time, you will be prompted to confirm your profile preferences, which will be used to personalize content.

We encourage you to explore the new website and visit your updated My RAPS page. If you need assistance, please review our FAQ page.

We welcome your feedback. Please let us know how we can continue to improve your experience.