The International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) recently announced that its S1B(R1) addendum outlining a “weight of evidence” (WoE) approach to assess the human carcinogenic risk for certain pharmaceuticals in lieu of conducting a two-year rat study has reached Step 4 and is awaiting sign-off by regulators.
Since the publication of the original S1B guideline on carcinogenicity testing in 1998, “scientific advances toward elucidation of mechanisms of carcinogenicity, greater understanding of the limitations of rodent models, and several retrospective analyses of pharmaceutical datasets indicate that 2-year rat carcinogenicity studies might not add value to human carcinogenicity risk assessment in some cases and the carcinogenic potential could have been assessed adequately based on a comprehensive assessment of all available pharmacological, biological, and toxicological data,” said an ICH announcement.
The addendum describes how to use the WoE approach to assess the human carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals. This approach uses three factors to consider whether the test compound is either likely carcinogenic and two-year rat studies would not add much value; likely not to be carcinogenic and a two-year rat study would not add much value; or with uncertain carcinogenic risk and a study is likely to add value to the human risk assessment.
It also describes the factors to consider for a WoE assessment, how to integrate these factors for assessing the human carcinogenic risk and describes when mouse carcinogenicity studies are needed. An appendix provides some examples of how to apply these WoE approaches.
The addendum revises the previous version by incorporating the original ICH S1B guideline on carcinogenicity testing as a new Part 1 section. This change was to accommodate public comments requesting the original guideline be published along with the addendum to reduce confusion and ensure the new WoE approach is adequately used and implemented rather than publish the addendum as a separate document.
The update also includes a new flow chart outlining key steps in developing a carcinogenic assessment strategy to determine the value of a two-year rat study, as well as a flow chart showing how to integrate the WoE factors for assessing a pharmaceutical’s human carcinogenic risk.
With the implementation of the addendum, “It is anticipated that industry will generate and submit a WoE based carcinogenicity assessment for DRA [Drug Regulatory Authority] consideration when a sponsor concludes that a 2-year rat study does not add value to human carcinogenicity risk assessment,” according to an ICH presentation.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued final guidance on 13 August regarding the types and timelines for formal meetings that sponsors can request during the development of new drugs and biological products.
Welcome to another installment of This Week at FDA, your weekly source for updates – big and small – on FDA, drug, and medical device regulation, and what we’re reading from around the web.
Industry and other stakeholders want the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide more clarity and ensure flexibility in a revised guidance on how drug and medical device makers should communicate with payors and other stakeholders about their products.