RAPS Learning Portal will be under maintenance on 12 June 2026 between 10 PM - 12 AM ET. Learning Portal functionality and profile access may be unavailable during this window.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
Baxter, GE HealthCare, Philips are at risk from changes in hospital spending: Moody’s (MedtechDive)
Samsung gets FDA clearance for irregular heart notification feature, catching up with Apple and Fitbit (MedtechDive)
At Musk’s brain-chip startup, animal-testing panel is rife with potential conflicts (Reuters)
Fresenius Medical profit drops less than feared, labour shortages ease (Reuters)
PerkinElmer life science and diagnostics spinoff reveals new name and brand identity (Endpoints)
Thermo Fisher, Pfizer team up on global access to cancer DNA testing (Fierce)
Siemens Healthineers, GE HealthCare Race To Develop Next-Gen AI Solutions For Personalized Care (MedtechInsight)
Quidel Subsidiary Lands First De Novo Clearance For COVID-19 Serology Tests (MedtechInsight)
Government, Regulatory & Legal
Abortion providers sue FDA in a Virginia federal court over mifepristone restrictions (Endpoints)
Abortion pill case to be heard by conservative, anti-abortion panel (Reuters)
Q&A: Sen. Sanders on insulin costs and his committee’s generic drug kerfuffle (STAT)
Regulatory Recon is our regular intelligence briefing for the regulatory affairs space, bringing you the top regulatory, biopharma and medtech news stories from around the globe. Regulatory Recon is published each week on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday.
A story’s inclusion in Regulatory Recon does not imply endorsement by Regulatory Focus or RAPS.
Three major pharmaceutical industry groups—two in the US and one in India—have called for changes to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Scale-Up and Post-Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidelines. They believe these guidelines should be updated to reflect more modern manufacturing methods and better align with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) standards.
Patients with breast cancer said faster approval times for oncology products, as a trade-off for evidentiary certainty, is most permissible in situations where there are no treatment alternatives, the results from a recent qualitative study suggest.