RAPS Learning Portal will be under maintenance on 12 June 2026 between 10 PM - 12 AM ET. Learning Portal functionality and profile access may be unavailable during this window.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
EHDS Data Sharing Rules Are Good News For Medtech, But Is The Public On Board? (MedTech Insight)
Philips Trilogy Evo ventilators face another Class I recall (MedTech Dive)
Butterfly nets AI ultrasound clearance for spotting signs of lung disease (Fierce)
FDA approves biodegradable metal screw implant for fixing broken bones (Fierce)
Louisiana Court Dismisses Insulin Pump Defection Case As Claims ‘Twiqballed’ (MedTech Insight)
Government, Regulatory and Legal
Arbutus files patent infringement lawsuit against Pfizer/BioNTech over COVID shots (Reuters)
Sandoz to pay Allergan, Duke University $39M over eye drug lawsuit, jury says (Endpoints) (Fierce)
Bayer defeats Merck in lawsuit over talc liabilities (Reuters) (Bloomberg)
Advocates Say Preventive Care Ruling Could Harm Patients And Innovation (MedTech Insight) (Endpoints)
Eighth Circuit Lets Drugmakers Challenge Free Insulin Program (Bloomberg)
Opioid Victims Wait as Second Circuit Mulls Purdue Pharma Deal (Bloomberg)
Direct Biologics Gets New Look in Noncompete, Trade Secrets Case (Bloomberg)
Regulatory Recon is our regular intelligence briefing for the regulatory affairs space, bringing you the top regulatory, biopharma and medtech news stories from around the globe. Regulatory Recon is published each week on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday.
A story’s inclusion in Regulatory Recon does not imply endorsement by Regulatory Focus or RAPS.
Three major pharmaceutical industry groups—two in the US and one in India—have called for changes to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Scale-Up and Post-Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidelines. They believe these guidelines should be updated to reflect more modern manufacturing methods and better align with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) standards.
Patients with breast cancer said faster approval times for oncology products, as a trade-off for evidentiary certainty, is most permissible in situations where there are no treatment alternatives, the results from a recent qualitative study suggest.