RAPS Learning Portal will be under maintenance on 12 June 2026 between 10 PM - 12 AM ET. Learning Portal functionality and profile access may be unavailable during this window.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
EMA considers new biomarkers, patient populations in proposed Parkinson’s disease guideline update
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has released a concept paper proposing discussion questions about what should be contained in a future clinical guideline revision for Parkinson’s disease, the first revision in more than a decade.
“The Central Nervous System Working Party (CNSWP) recommends drafting a revision of Parkinson's disease guideline including the utility and role of new biomarkers to inform enrolment in clinical trials/enrichment approach and other forms of Parkinsonism and related disorders,” the authors of the concept paper wrote.
When finalized, the proposed guideline will replace the second revision of the Parkinson’s disease guideline released in July 2012.
However, the concept paper states that the existing guideline “predates some recent developments in the field” such as proposed biomarker algorithms for clinical trial selection, considerations for the development of new treatments, and guidance for disease with non-motor symptoms. Another proposal for the guideline revision is to expand it to other neurodegenerative movement disorders such as multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy.
“Advanced [Parkinson’s disease] and other movement disorders patients are increasingly being treated with treatments such as parenteral levodopa/agonists, deep brain stimulation, and focused ultrasounds (FUS),” the concept paper explained. “These patients have usually been excluded from clinical trials with medicines; discussion on strategies to include this population in studies is needed.”
The revised guideline would not include discussion of the development of drug-device combination, treatments for non-rare neurodegenerative movement disorders, or essential tremor.
EMA discussion questions
EMA noted that interested parties for the guidance document would be other regulatory agencies and members of the pharmaceutical industry as well as organizations such as The Movement Disorders Society, European Academy of Neurology, The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology, and The European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
The agency is seeking answers to several topics surrounding Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative movement disorders, including the discussion of including clinical and non-clinical biomarkers for enrollment in clinical trials, updated primary and secondary endpoints for motor and non-motor symptoms, whether patients with medical devices should be included in clinical trials, randomized clinical trial design and whether that should include underlying pathophysiological processes in addition to symptomatic treatment, decentralized components of clinical trial design, how concomitant medication can impact treatment, and other considerations for treatments of neurodegenerative movement disorders and for essential tremor.
EMA said the draft guidance document is expected to be released no later than the fourth quarter of 2026.
A recent report from the US Pharmacopeia (USP) reveals that drug shortages decreased by 23% in 2025; however, the duration of shortages is on the rise. Over 64% of the drugs that are currently in shortage have been unavailable for more than three years, and 39% have been in shortage for over five years.
Three major pharmaceutical industry groups—two in the US and one in India—have called for changes to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Scale-Up and Post-Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidelines. They believe these guidelines should be updated to reflect more modern manufacturing methods and better align with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) standards.
Patients with breast cancer said faster approval times for oncology products, as a trade-off for evidentiary certainty, is most permissible in situations where there are no treatment alternatives, the results from a recent qualitative study suggest.