RAPS Learning Portal will be under maintenance on 12 June 2026 between 10 PM - 12 AM ET. Learning Portal functionality and profile access may be unavailable during this window.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
EMA releases final guideline on antibacterial drug development
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued a final guideline on evaluating antibacterial medicines that is globally aligned with guidance from other regulators.
EMA said the document addresses a “pressing need for new antibacterial agents suitable for treating infections in patients with few remaining therapeutic options.”
The agency announced that antimicrobial resistance poses a “global threat” and is responsible for an estimated 33,000 deaths per year with a cost of €1.5 billion per year in healthcare costs and productivity losses.
The publication of the revised guidance follows a public consultation held in 2016 and reflects the outcomes of discussions between regulators in the EU, the US and Japan to align their respective data requirements for antibacterial drugs to expedite the development of such medicines worldwide.
The guidance will come into effect on 1 December 2022. It replaces an earlier guideline from 2012. The addendum on evaluating medicines to treat bacterial infections in children has been revised alongside the guidance. (RELATED: EMA Consults on Harmonized Antibacterial Drug Development Guideline, Regulatory Focus 14 January 2019).
The guidance contains revised recommendations for primary endpoints, primary analysis population and non-inferiority margins in trials to support certain infection site-specific indications for use. The revision also provides clarifications on clinical programs that are intended to address an unmet need and includes new guidance to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections and uncomplicated gonorrhea.
The update also removes a section on antibacterial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic development because these topics are already addressed in separate guidance.
The document applies to antibacterial agents developed as single agents, antibacterial agents developed for use in combination with one or more other specific antibacterial agents and beta lactam (BL) agents developed for use with beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs).
EMA said some of the principles covered in the guide are also applicable to developing agents that affect bacterial virulence, bacteriophages proposed to treat infections, agents that inhibit bacterial growth and replicate indirectly and monoclonal antibodies used as a prophylaxis for specific indications.
The guidance addresses microbiological investigations; general considerations for clinical programs, such as patient selection, clinical evidence of infection at enrollment and microbiological evidence of infection at enrollment. It also addresses specimen collection and dosing regimens.
Other topics include when to switch patients from parenteral to oral therapy and how to test antibacterial agents with licensed agents.
Addendum address antibacterial development children
EMA also issued an addendum addressing clinical development programs to support medicines to treat bacterial infections in children. The guidance, issued on 20 May, replaces a draft version issued in April 2018.
EMA announced that “for the treatment of some infections, efficacy results can be extrapolated in certain age groups by looking at efficacy data from adults. The addendum mentions that companies developing new antibiotics need to develop an extrapolation concept and provide deials about it in an extrapolation plan.”
Three major pharmaceutical industry groups—two in the US and one in India—have called for changes to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Scale-Up and Post-Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidelines. They believe these guidelines should be updated to reflect more modern manufacturing methods and better align with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) standards.
Patients with breast cancer said faster approval times for oncology products, as a trade-off for evidentiary certainty, is most permissible in situations where there are no treatment alternatives, the results from a recent qualitative study suggest.