RAPS Learning Portal will be under maintenance on 12 June 2026 between 10 PM - 12 AM ET. Learning Portal functionality and profile access may be unavailable during this window.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
After asset purchase from Travere, Mirum's Ctexli crosses FDA finish line in rare metabolic disorder (Fierce Pharma)
Abbott's stigma-busting campaign shows how diabetes biases lead to silence, skipped care (Fierce Pharma)
Medtech
What diagnostic tests can teach about spotting public fraud (STAT)
US FDA approves Medtronic's medical device for Parkinson's disease (Reuters)
VitalConnect raises $100M for heart monitor patch (MedTech Dive)
After tough year, Baxter looks for next CEO to drive growth (MedTech Dive)
Warning Letters: An Untapped Source for Understanding When Device Changes Require a New 510(k) (FDA Law Blog)
Government, Regulatory & Legal
Maryland lawmakers vote to expand powers of the state’s prescription drug affordability board (STAT)
Federal judge extends restraining order on Trump administration’s cap on NIH indirect costs (STAT)
US health agencies delay decision on definition of 'healthy' on food labels (Reuters)
MAHA Commission: Will Conclusions Arrive By The Deadline? Internal Panel Has Aggressive Mandate (Pink Sheet)
Regulatory Recon is our regular intelligence briefing for the regulatory affairs space, bringing you the top regulatory, biopharma and medtech news stories from around the globe. Regulatory Recon is published each week on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday.
A story’s inclusion in Regulatory Recon does not imply endorsement by Regulatory Focus or RAPS.
Three major pharmaceutical industry groups—two in the US and one in India—have called for changes to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Scale-Up and Post-Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidelines. They believe these guidelines should be updated to reflect more modern manufacturing methods and better align with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) standards.
Patients with breast cancer said faster approval times for oncology products, as a trade-off for evidentiary certainty, is most permissible in situations where there are no treatment alternatives, the results from a recent qualitative study suggest.